click this image for video
“Let me tell you why you’re here…
You’re here because you know something.
What you know you can’t explain,
but you feel it.
You felt it your entire life
that there’s something very wrong with the world.
You don’t know what it is—but it’s there,
like a splinter in your mind,
driving you mad…”.
Go to Rabbit Hole Grand Central for links to all pages
Click image for video
Click button for PDF
The Concealed Colony
A book exposing the goings on behind the scenes
has been banned by the federal police....
when you read it the penny might drop.
This book exposes the what's really gone on
in Australia and the crimes against the
people of the Commonwealth.
This book was stripped off the shelves
by the federal police of Australia,
and the Question remains
what happened to the
Commonwealth Police Force.
Is something being hidden from you?
click image for video
Australia was sold out in 1966. (There’s that ’66’ again)
Since then, Australia has been ‘without a Prime Minister, a Governor General and all elected heads of State’
There’s only 1 political party – The Liberal Party – the rest are fakes.
There’s so much in this video – just watch it and see how Australia’s been shafted.
Simple proof that it’s illegal – there’s been no referendum.
There must be a way out – but when the courts aren’t representing the people because they’re business’ employed by the ‘Corporation’, there’s no government, no police, no military where can ordinary people go?
Australia’s new PM, Albanese, not around for even a week, is already making moves to break away any remianing ties with England completely.
If he gets to do this, Australia’s ‘watertight constitution’ will be gone forever and Australians will be slaves to the Corporation, represented by those who have all the power – who are unelected.
For copies of David Walter documents:- https://officeofthepublicdefender.com.au/
Share this – the only possible fight we have is for a billion people to know what’s been going on – and do something about it before it’s too late, if it’s not already.
BTW – it’s likely both Canada and New Zealand, at least, are in the same situation.
click image for video
David Walter Documents
the following is just a copy
David Walter is this amazing man who lives up in north Queensland, he was a police prosecutor for over 40 years – a Sergeant for many years in Northern Territory – he witnessed first hand Gough Whitlam and met the Queen on her second visit to Australia when they tried to get her to sign the Royal Styles and Title Act 1973 but she knew exactly what they were doing and signed her name at the top of the page above the wrong seal making it invalid.
David had 40 years and a few personal experiences that enabled him to figure out how they managed to hijack the entire political landscape of Australia including the courts, the judiciary and the minds of the over fluoridated Australian people in the guise of a republic and self identity all the while stealing and lying to parliament to line their own pockets, it would be genius if it wasn’t so evil.
David’s original petition which sits on the King’s bench un-rebutted is drawn from his right to do this according to the 1627 Petition of Right Act, it has also been successful in court and is now flagged to be stopped (they don’t make it easy for you) you have it submitted to court as a link (it is up on Public Notices Australia board).
Don’t make any changes to this document
file it as is.
Print out the David J. Walter’s Full Original Petition – is 119 pages, print the first page in colour the rest in black and white, double sided will make it lighter to post ( its heavier that 500 gram deeming it too heavy for a standard pre paid registered international envelope) – it needs 4 holes in the spine to thread it with purple ribbon watch the video below for instruction.
Sending this petition of right to the Queen is essentially asking the CEO to appoint a new Governor-General as we have not had one in 55 years – it too will sit on the King’s bench.
Download your personal version from the state or colony you reside in and swap out the red writing with your details and don’t forget to make it all black before printing its only 6 pages long.
Wastelands Act and places you under the Partnership Act – legislation below.
More information on David Walter and his court case – Walter vs Queensland Premier, and an article about David – who did lose his house in order to fully prove the fraud – but luckily Bob was in the wings and was able to purchase the house back for him and he continues to live there till this day.
Here is the
securities commission document
to show the government are a private corporation.
Click image for video
Australian Tax Office ATO
does not exist
A barrister in Sydney presented this information to a Judicial Registrar who was hearing a liquidation proceeding.
The Registrar adjourned the case immediately, after appearing “visibly shaken”.
Only a matter of hours later, an airline pilot who is in the Federal Court in Melbourne, against the A.T.O., was contacted by solicitors representing that august body, and informed that they were not proceeding with the case.
I wonder why?
I quote from an earlier F.O.I. Act request asking for “.. certified copies of the documents that establish the Australian Taxation Office”.
In response, Mr. R. J. Tomkins, (A.T.O. Solicitor), reports:
“With regards the creation of the Australian Taxation Office (A.T.O.), I was able to ascertain that the A.T.O was created as a branch of the Commonwealth Public Service by an executive instrument in 1973.
Officers of the Commonwealth Public Service are assigned to the A.T.O and the Commissioner of Taxation is put in charge of those Officers by section 25(4) of the Public Service Act 1922.
“An extensive search of the A.T.O. library and records management system failed to identify any document relevant to this part of your request.
Similarly, enquiries to the Commissioner’s Office, People and Structures Branch, The Delegations and Authorisations Officer and the Parliamentary Business Unit did not identify any document.
“On the advice of the Australian Government Solicitor’s Office, I contacted the Office of the Official Secretary to the Governor-General in an attempt to identify, and obtain a copy of the executive instrument.
This office referred me to the Federal Executive Council who then suggested I contact Australian Archives.
A detailed search by all offices failed to locate the relevant document.
“Accordingly, I am obliged in terms of section 24A of the Act to deny access to this part of your application on the grounds that I was not able to locate the requested document”.
It was from this original F.O.I. Act request, that the I.T.R. was eventually able to identify that the A.T.O. was never legally formed, and therefore, has been illegally illiciting taxes since its formation!
The I.T.R. takes the view that all the tax laws in the country are illegal anyway, (under an illegal Constitution), and that therefore, taxes are voluntary.
Click image for video
AUSTRALIA and "Commonwealth of Australia" are not the same!
it appears that AUSTRALIA's border starts 200 Meters offshore and extends 200 nautical miles out to sea also including some islands, however, the Commonwealth of Australia is not "included" in the government's interpretation of what constitutes AUSTRALIA.
This may be happening in all western countries around the world. AUSTRALIA.
What Australia REALLY is
according to the
Australian Taxation Office
Click image for video
Where is Australia
What the government is hiding
Australia was sold to USA many years ago - but what was sold?
WHY are we paying tax to Australia?
WHERE does the tax go?
WHO is the tax being paid to?
WHAT is the tax used for?
The 'territories' or the huge lump of mineral-rich-dirt-with-no-name
surrounded by the locations listed.
Many of them couldn't even be listed as 'islands'
as they're not much bigger than bumps sticking out of the ocean.
Either way, more history that's been hidden
by the traitors posing as 'goverment'.
More skulduggery to screw us over
if it wasn't it wouldn't be a secret.
Click image for PDF
What the government is hiding
Australia that we know it to be
does not exist.
The following excerpt from the
Australian Taxation Assessment Act 1997
Section 960 5.05
Confirms 'Australia' is:-
INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT ACT 1997
Meaning of Australia
- (1) Australia when used in a geographical sense, includes each of the following:
- (a) Norfolk Island
- (b) the Coral Sea Islands Territory;
- (c) the Territory of Ashmore and Cartier Islands;
- (d) the Territory of Christmas Island;
- (e) the Territory of Cocos (Keeling) Islands;
- (f) the Territory of Heard Island and the McDonald Islands.
(1) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 provides that an
Act is taken to have effect in the coastal sea
as if the coastal sea were part of Australia
(2) Australia when in a geographical sense, includes an offshore area
for the purposes of the Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Act 2006
Note 1: The offshore area includes all things located in that area,
including all installations and structures such as oil and gas rigs.
The area also extends to the airspace over,
and the sea-bed and subsoil beneath, that area.
Note 2: The offshore area includes the
exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of Australia
Click image for video
What Includes Australia
Due to the events Re: the so called Corona Virus,
this has been urgently uploaded for the latest finds
in relation to what includes Australia and New South Wales.
Click image for video
Public Service Announcement
for ALL Australians
More on how Australians are being screwed – but universal information.
Australians, you’ve been screwed since forever.
There’s so much in this video – too much to list.
Just watch it.
In 1973 Gough Whitlam sacked the Queen
Since then, true royal commission’s don’t exist anymore.
Gough Whitlam also removed 1901 constitutional right to referendum and royal commission.
We’re on a legalese Roman law system now, Corpus Juris Admiralty.
The bar survives on Gough’s treason, so does the corporate 1986 Australia Act.
So anyone thinking that royal commission will get real recognition, needs do do some research.
Copy of Letter from
Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT I am a former member of the High Court and I wish to take this unusual method of informing you about a matter that is going to deeply affect us all. Unfortunately, a document such as this is too easily “lost” in the bureaucratic jungle in which we operate.
A group of Australian Citizens have taken it upon themselves to test the validity of our current political and judicial system.
Like you, I have lived my entire legal career with the assumption that the basis for our legal and political system, state and federal, was written in stone.
This group has undertaken to present this paper when they test the legal system.
The group is articulate, well educated and counts some of our best legal minds amongst its members.
One of Australia’s best known barristers is one of the group’s leading lights.
It is far better informed with regard to international law than most members of the judiciary or for that matter, the legal academe.
It has better international contacts than I would have thought possible.
After spending some time with the group leader, I was able to elicit its primary intentions.
It is the introduction of a totally democratic system of government devoid of party politics operated by the will of the people incorporating a system of debit taxation which should go a long way to eliminating the current unemployment problem and also addressing other pressing social issues.
An Australian Bureau of Statistics model supports the proposal.
The group has so far concentrated on matters relating to taxation, state and federal, minor industrial and motor traffic while undertaking not to present a criminal defence using their current presentation.
I challenged the leader of this group to present any evidence he had with regard to the above defence so I could use my legal expertise to play the part of the devil’s advocate.
It should be brought to your attention that the group has access to documentation that we members of the judiciary have little knowledge.
I refer to the British Parliamentary Papers for the Colony of Australia for the years 1860 through to 1922.
These are photocopies of all documents correspondence etc., between the states and later the Commonwealth of Australia, the British Crown and the British Government. They are very revealing documents and indicate the degree of chicanery in which the politicians of all shades were involved and as I can now see, at the expense of the legal academe and the judiciary.
I present for your perusal the details of the group’s presentation along with my comment on each major item.
The group relies solely upon historical fact and rejects political rhetoric and legal opinion unless based upon historical fact.
1. “The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) is an act of the parliament of the United Kingdom. It did not contain any substance of sovereignty and was a colonial act centralising self-government of the six Australian Colonies. Australia remained a colony of the United Kingdom.”
1a. Although the late Lionel Murphy attempted to show that there was an element of sovereignty in this act he failed. The international definition of sovereignty has been espoused at length and the above act although important in the development of Australia, did not have the authority of sovereignty. The historical evidence that Australia remained a British Colony post 1901 is overwhelming. Page 1 Copy of Letter from Sir Harry Gibbs
2. “Australia made an international declaration of its intention to become a sovereign nation when Prime Minister Hughes and his deputy; Sir Joseph Cook signed the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. On its cognisance of signing this treaty, Australia was granted a “C” class League of Nations mandate over former German territories in the Pacific.
In effect, Papua New Guinea became a colony of Australia achieving its own independence on 16 September 1975. The League of Nations became part of International Law on 10 January 1920 with Article X of the Covenant of League of Nations guaranteeing the sovereignty of each member,”
2A. The Significance of Australia joining the League of Nations as a foundation member has never been addressed in Australia before. Strangely, only one book has ever examined the question of Australian independence. Written by W. J. Hudson and M. P. Sharp in 1988 “Australian Independence” printed by Melbourne University Press.
As both were members of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade at the time of authorship and had access to the, British Parliamentary Papers, I find it most interesting they have avoided any mention of these papers in their book. Their conclusion that Australia became an independent nation via. the Statute of Westminster in 1931 flies in the face of contradictory evidence within the above mentioned papers and readily available historical fact.
Prime Minister Hughes address to the Commonwealth Parliament on 10 September 1919, “Australia has now entered into a family of nations on a footing of equality. Australia has been born in a blood sacrifice.” demonstrates the politicians of the day were only too well aware of the change of status from a colony to that of sovereign nation while attempting to remain within the Empire.
Prime Minister Bruce made this reply to the British Government in 1922 after a request for troops against Kernel Ataturk in the Chanak crisis.
Bruce’s reply is contained in the British Parliamentary Papers: “We have to try to ensure there shall be an Empire foreign policy which if we are to be in anyway responsible for it, must be one to which we agree and have assented. If we are to take any responsibility for the Empire’s foreign policy, there must be a better system, so that we may be consulted and have a better opportunity to express the views of the people of this country. We cannot blindly submit to any policy which may involve us in war.”
This is a far cry from the declaration of war against Germany made on behalf of the British Colony of Australia by George V of the United Kingdom in 1914.
I have re-produced Bruce’s reply in full as I believe this reply contains clear historical evidence of a Prime Minister who was well aware of the change of status from a. colony to a sovereign nation.
The later Statute of Westminster 1931 was an acknowledgment of that status.
3. “Paragraph 4 of the Statue of Westminster Act 1931 contravenes Article X of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Paragraph 1 of the Australia Act 1986 contravenes Article 2 paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Charter of the United Nations.”
3A Paragraph 4 of the Statute of Westminster reads “No Act of Parliament of the United. Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to a Dominion as part of the law of that Dominion, unless it is expressly declared in that Act that Dominion, has requested, and consented to the enactment thereof.”
Paragraph 1 of the Australia Act is very similar: “No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Copy of Letter from Sir Harry Gibbs Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to the Commonwealth, to a State or Territory as part of the law of the Commonwealth, of the State or of the Territory.”
I passed this one to the Federal Attorney General and asked him what was the source of this quite incredible authority that sought to overturn the authority legislated within the Covenant of the League of Nations in Article X and the Charter of the United Nations in Article 2 paragraphs 1 and 4.
He is unable to provide any documentation to support these clauses, Article X of the Covenant of the League of Nations states: “The members of the League undertake to respect and preserve against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence of all Members of the League. In case of any such aggression or in case of any threat or danger of such aggression, the Council shall advise upon the means by which this obligation shall be fulfilled.”
It is appropriate that I now introduce a statement by Sir Geoffrey Butler KBE, MA and Fellow, Librarian and Lecturer in International Law and Diplomacy of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge author of “A Handbook to-the League of Nations” used as a reference to the League by virtually all nations at that time.
He refers to Article 1 of the Covenant of the League of Nations.
“It is arguable that this article is the Covenant’s most significant single measure.
By it the British Dominions, namely New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, and Canada, have their independent nationhood established for the first time.
There may be friction over small matters in giving effect to this internationally acknowledged fact but the Dominions will always look to the League of Nations Covenant as their Declaration of Independence. Article 2 paragraph 1 of the United Nation’s Charter states “The Organisation is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.”
Article 2 paragraph 4 of the Charter states ‘All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”
In view of the above, the historical evidence for Australian Independence by 10 January 1920 when the League of Nations became part of International Law is overwhelming. When this evidence is reinforced with the contents of the Charter of the United Nations, the continued usage of any legislation that owes its very legitimacy to the parliament of an acknowledged foreign power cannot be supported by either legal opinion or indeed historical evidence.
I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in Australia and its States and Territories has no basis in law.
Following discussions with members of the British Government relating to the Letters Patent for the Governor General and State Governors I find that these documents no longer have any authority.
Indeed, the Queen of the United, Kingdom is excluded from any position of power in Australia by the United Nations Charter and is excluded under UK law from the issue of a Letters Patent to other than a British Subject.
A Letters Patent must refer to an action to be taken with regard to British Citizens.
The Immigration Act. 1972 UK defines Australian Citizen as aliens.
The Governor General’s Letters Patent is a comedy of errors.
We are greeted in the name of the Queen of Australia who suddenly becomes the Queen of the United Kingdom in the next paragraph.
This Queen the gives instructions to the Governor General with reference to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK.
Here we have a clear breach of Article 2 paragraph 1 of the United Nation Charter.
Under both UK and international law, the-Queen is a British Citizen.
State Governors are in a worse position as their authority comes from the late Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom.
Regardless of the validity of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK, if the authority of Governor General and the State Governors is invalid then so is the entire political and legal system of government.
When advised that the War Crimes Commission was taking an interest, I called them in Geneva.
Under the 1947 Geneva Convention, they are empowered to look into eases here in Australia where it is alleged the law of a foreign country was enforced against a citizen of a member state of the United Nations. As they perceive that only the judiciary can actually enforce the law, the judiciary becomes their target.
The group has already placed cases before them which they ate currently investigating.
If found guilty, the penalties are horrific and include the death penalty!
I could go on with more relevant information however I think now is the time for a summary.
The group leader, a QC, states the obvious when he asked me how could a colony now acknowledged by all world nations to be a sovereign Nation retain exactly the same legal and political system it enjoyed as a colony without any change whatsoever to the basis for law.
This point alone requires an answer.
The High Court has already answered with regard to the position held by treaties signed by the Commonwealth Government in the Teoh case of 1994. “Ordinary people have the right to expect government officials to consider Australia’s international obligations even if those obligations are not reflected in specific Acts of Parliament: the rights recognised in international treaties are an implied limit on executive processes.”
My advice is to adjourn any case “sine die” that that challenges the authority of the Letters Patent. Under no circumstances hear a case that challenges the validity of a State or the Federal Constitution.
It is the politicians who are using us as pawns without them having to face the music.
These matters are of concern to politicians, let them sort out these problems and accept any inherent risks themselves ! Article 36 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice is the correct reference for you to refuse to hear a matter when an international treaty is cited as a defence.
The Justinian Deception (PDF)
Justinian Deception website
Why you are paying bills that aren't yours,
ALL YOUR LIFE
addressed to another person
with a name in UPPER CASE TEXT?
For the love of people and humanity:
The Deception is DOG-LATIN, being
the corruption in the text.
The all uppercase foreign text is the DOG-LATIN
appearing as the cause of the counterfeit-fraud.
The act of usurping “DOG-LATIN” into English
written instruments in order to deceive the public
into surrendering the Treasury, is EVIL and DEMONIC.
VATICAN Control over the underworld
via the JUSTINIAN-DECEPTION…
Click Image for website or button for PDF
The Justinian Deception
The Perfect Crime
A trust has three parties but a Quasi trust has the office of three parties, the Office of Creditor, the Office of Debtor and the Office of Administrator but only two such offices are held by man at any one given point rendering such a three way trust as a fraud or false trust.
When only the debtor and the Administrator are present, without the Creditor appearing, such a trust will convert the Administrator from Administration to Creditor! and never have to settle the bills of the State because we were deceived into falling from creditor into debtor through a dirty planned grammatical deception
So only knowing half the story or half of the deception is dangerous, its when you know your own legal or political standing, (Creditor, Debtor or Administrator) you will have the ability to know when to speak and when to shut your mouth.
Political Doublespeak, a governmental and private bankers weapon used to deceive the illiterate into falling into contracts
that they may never have agreed with if fully aware of the deceptions employed...
How do BANKS really work when "Money" and "DOLLARS" are completely separate "things"?
A DOLLAR is a Military or Company Scrip, an internal bank note or promise to pay at some point in the future and only relates to the "internal" private account holders of such a private "corporate" banking entity.
A DOLLAR is not money evidenced by the Latin meanings of both words: "Dollar" and "Money" The very word Bank, does not mean "Safe", a bank is the edge of a river, that controls (Directs) the flow of current, (Currency) energy is current, dollars are the ACCOUNTS of debt currency, so a bank does not have money! it is the director of the flow of debt currency.
(Debt titles being DOLLAR's)
The gold is you, being the dominion over the Mineral and Energy wealth that was originally granted to the living man and without you acting as the ACCOUNT holder of their bank, (Under a hidden TRUST-LAW-SPLIT-TITLE arrangement that renders you as the Legal Title holder of their ACCOUNT), they lose equitable rights over your Dominion because Dominion was never granted to a dead entity such as a corporation, "Dominion" was only ever granted to man and the Bank can only act as a commercial "agent" of living man on the condition such a living man has agreed or been deceived into acting as the DEAD ACCOUNT holder of such a BANK in order that the "Equitable Title" falls into the hands of the Bank.
The BANK sits between your "Christian" name (CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH) and your "SURNAME" (STATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE) as an Agent-administrator of the Christian name (Christian ACCOUNT. being the separate CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH, birthed on the registration date), Once the BANK can deceive you into assuming that "their" SURNAME, that looks a lot like your heritage name, ("Smith" is glossed into "SMITH") the bank assumes consent in order to confer the legal title of the BANK to their SURNAME that you assumed was your property. (ALL UPPERCASE TEXT is a foreign written language identified in article 11:147 of the: Chicago Manual of Styles 16th edition)
Your surname glossed into a foreign SIGN language, is not your property! but when you attach your Christian name, being the name that is attached to your dominion, to their foreign ALL UPPERCASE SURNAME you, by your own consent, become subject to the ACCOUNT of their property ... So simple but so effective and yet so biblically perfect once you violate the laws of the first GOD by serving the false God, GOD of the person-corporation.
The POWER of TRUST-LAW is the greatest power of all... Trust Law is Master-Servant, relationship, it does not work backwards, it is the system of conferring debt ACCOUNTS onto the unsuspecting...
The one who accepts LEGAL TITLE is the one who acknowledges that the Equitable Title is with the one who granted such a man the LEGAL TITLE.
LEGAL TITLE can not be held by a living man. only a "Person" can hold Legal Title and what is a Person you may ask, it is the legal title holder of man.
The only thing that created the "Person", being a mask in a play, was the VATICAN: "ROME".
The Word "Vatican" means: "vat I can", meaning, "holder or vessel I can do", meaning, the VATICAN has become the first Trustee Legal Title holder of the dominion of the living man.
The VATICAN has become the beast of burden, it has no jurisdiction with living man because it agreed to act as the trustee...
The VATICAN, that now held the Legal Title over the Dominion of man, offered the ACCOUNTS of the Legal Title to its own Persons by offering such a title to a living man and only when the living man was deceived into accepting such an ACCOUNT, did such a man become the "assumed debtor trustee person" of the world debts of the VATICAN and such acceptance of such an ACCOUNT was the "conformation" that granted Equitable Title back to the VATICAN because the living man accepted Legal Title, rendering the living man to fall into the jurisdiction of the DEAD ACCOUNT holder of the VATICAN beast instead of being the first trustee to the real GOD of living man.
The VATICAN is the GOD of the dead persons because it was not God of man that created the DEAD juristic corporate Person, it was the VATICAN that created such a thing as the "Person".
The VATICAN is the false GOD
Click Image for Video
Why is Satan depicted as the goat?
... this may be the symbolic answer....
Click Image for website or button for PDF
ILLUSION of power
Dealing with the occult-fraud of foreign corporate banking entities.
In relation to the: "Entertainment Only" My family and I received threats from the head of CIB in Cairns: (McLeish) (And other warnings) warning that if I maintain the work that I do, "I won't know what hit me" and he went on to say that anyone else involved with me will get it even worse. So for this reason, I publish all my work as "Entertainment only" leaving it up to you in order to do your own checking in relation to such subject matter within such videos.
Australia is now governed by the UNIDROIT treaty of Rome, under "PRIVATE-LAW" (Foreign corporations and their foreign grammatically debased written language) so all I want Australians to do is wake up to the reality of what the so called "Australian Government" has done to the people of Australia by selling us out to foreign corporations by way of stealth.
The system of "consent" in relation to private contract law is complex and cunning and in order to comprehend such complexities, one must understand the "concept" of how private contract law (Corporate governance) really works first and once you comprehend such a concept, dealing with it starts to fall into place...
remember this, the public standing is the highest political stand, the "private" is the lowest rank in the military! so if you claim to be "private" you better know the rules of how the PRIVATE-SYSTEM works or you could loose everything you thought you owned...
The world of PRIVATE-CONTRACTS is the world of the DEAD and the Bible is the warning in relation to dealing with such dead entities. The VATICAN, being the serpent in the garden of Eden, holds the "copyright" over such a DEAD world and its written symbolic language. Adam and Eve, is a hidden code and probably the most important code to comprehend in relation to understanding modern day corporate foreign governance.
The "Creditor" and the "Debtor" ....
The political standing: Public or Private.
Thanks to all the good people from all over the world that care about our God given rights and freedoms and our public political standing...
Click Image for website or button for PDF
A License to be killed
Why are all "Acts" that are passed in corporate governing parliaments reliant on a "proclamation" date yet to be set at some point in the future?
... To make a "claim" is to take upon ones self!
.... Do you serve a "foreign nation" because you were grammatically deceived?...
Click Image for video
Deceived into Consent
There are three languages, one for the debtor, one for the creditor and one for the administrator....
Even though you may assume that you can read all three, they are totally three separate languages and have no jurisdiction with each other unless you "consent' ...
but your consent comes with ignorance of the difference between such three languages and assume them to be one language... Its all a big fat lie...
The Governor General and the Australian government is a counterfeit...
There is no such written English as: "Governor-General", it should be: "Governor General" without the hyphen...
The hyphen grammatically destroys the name.
Click Image for Video
Presumption of Law
The deadly secret grammatical deception
administered by the private banking system
that destroys our ability to access
common law and true justice.
The deadly grammatical trick explained.
Click Image for Video
Rohan on the latest news
to do with the GLOSSA
Click Image for Video
This website is always
'work in progress'
Send files or messages direct to
Browse in safety
This website does not collect
any information or leave cookies