Some points
to explain why
the 1901 is a fraud

1. There is only one commonwealth and that’s the commonwealth of great Britain of which Australia is a part.

It has a prime minister that is suppose to be put forward by Parliament to be approved by the governor general, the representative of the crown.

This means that Australia is under the governance of one system and cannot create its own commonwealth.

2. The royal prerogative to deny assent was removed in 1688 by Parliament through the creation of the bill of rights therefore Queen Victoria did not hold the authority of the people to grant assent to any commonwealth nation having their own constitution as she was a treasonous monarch.

So under the correct governing monarchy structure all fake constitutions are null and void.

3. The Magna Carta 1215 is a democratic common law constitution that recognises the people as the supreme judiciary and legislature meaning the people govern themselves through the independence of the jury the judge and annul government legislation.

4. The 1688 bill of rights took away jury independence so that a government dictatorship could be established..colonisation began 100 years later therefore the colonies were established on the principles of dictatorship.

5. The 1901 was written by British parliament (a dictatorship) that set up Australian parliament as the supreme judiciary see chapter 71 judicature act.

Any system that gives government the power to judge the legitimacy of it’s own legislation and the power to punish people into compliance is by definition a dictatorship.

6.Australia was setup as for profit outdoor prison whose largest revenue raiser was crime and prisons because administered by Parliament considering it gave itself the power to write and enforce legislation the interfered with peoples natural born rights.

7. Back in 1901 the people were ignorant and still are as to the meaning of democracy.

They were led to believe democracy was voting for two wings of the same bird with one agenda. By then voting in elections for a political party was well established therefore what the people accepted as democracy.

Consensus does not change the truth but it does become what is accepted as truth political parties only began to form prior to the creation of the bill of rights which signalled the shift of power away from the last governmental failsafe mechanism of the monarch (takes an oath to protect the rights of the people from government intrusion) denying assent to any legislation that infringes on the peoples rights.v

8. Government has the capacity to become criminal in nature by being influenced by private interests and the only mechanisms that prevent criminal government (royal prerogative and jury independence were removed in 1688.

9. By upholding the 1901 dictatorship people are saying they are bound to the ignorance of their forefathers to remain a prison colony under government dictatorship.

10. The word democracy means the people rule not the people vote for which flavour of slave master they want to be whipped by. Without jury independence the people are enslaved.

The 1901 is the antithesis of democracy and it’s time for Australians to mature by understanding the sins of the past so they can stop repeating them.

11. Magna Carta 1215 is a restatement of the democratic common law constitution that formed the construction of a nation state which was sealed in perpetuity making it the sole constitution for the entire British Commonwealth realm because a legitimate constitution imposes limits on what government can do not the people, so we need to take responsibility and use the standards government knows it’s bound to assert our natural born freedoms therefore liberating ourselves from government dictatorship.

Understanding the principles of democracy contained in the MC1215 is the only solution to getting government get out of our way and back to its intended purpose of keeping the power on and emptying the bins.

  Article
Federation of Australia
1901

King Charles III
proclaimed as Lord of Mann

His Majesty King Charles III will be proclaimed as Lord of Mann at Government House at 12 noon on Sunday 11 September 2022.

Only 3 days after official death of QE2

The Proclamation will be read by the Lieutenant Governor, His Excellency Lieutenant General Sir John Lorimer.

Whilst the public are able to attend, regrettably there is only limited on-site car parking at Government House.

Therefore, the public are instead encouraged to attend the second Proclamation Ceremony in St John’s at 11 am on Friday 16 September 2022.

The second Proclamation will be made from Tynwald Hill, the ancient seat of the Kings and Lords of Mann.

Following this, a resolution of loyalty and condolence will be put before a sitting of Tynwald Court in the Royal Chapel.

This ceremony is based on the one held at St John’s in February 1952 to proclaim Queen Elizabeth II, and is similar in outline to the normal Tynwald Day ceremony.

It will begin with a short act of worship in the Royal Chapel. The actual Proclamation will take place on Tynwald Hill and the sitting will conclude back in the Royal Chapel.

The public are welcome to witness the proceedings on the Hill. Sound amplification will be put in place as far as possible in the time available. The event will be broadcast on Manx Radio and live-streamed online. There will be no grandstand seating.

Office-holders who formed part of the processions at the most recent Tynwald Day will be contacted by the Clerk of Tynwald’s Office with detailed instructions.

King Charles III proclaimed
as Lord of Mann
What’s REALLY going on

  What’s REALLY going on?

The Commander-in-Chief fraud
By Anna Von Reitz

How Lincoln affected Australia
you can’t make this up

Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claims March 6th 2005, January 19th 2023 in Seq:

We are attaching a summation of exactly how the lawful Australian Government and Constitution owed to the people of Australia was undermined by the British Monarchy, and how in fact, arbitrary changes in the definitions of words and the creation of a Commander-in-Chief office were used to implement this unlawful and illegal change.

This is how the British Territorial Government contrived to and succeeded in creating dictatorial powers for itself throughout the Commonwealth, and how its commercial “service” corporations overthrew the lawful national governments by fraud and deceit.

The author of the attached expose, Dick Yardley, a dedicated researcher, has done a masterful job of detailing the process that was also used to do the same thing throughout the Commonwealth nations, substituting an unlawful Territorial Government for the National Government owed — by sleight of hand and legal deceit.

The Perpetrators of these gross wrongs undertaken in breach of trust and service contract were consciously re-creating the fraud that Abraham Lincoln worked in America and spreading it to the Commonwealth with malice aforethought.

Lincoln deceived the public by appearing to run for and be elected to the actual Public Office of The President of The United States of America, while secretly operating in a private corporate capacity, that of “President” of the United States of America, Incorporated.

This substitution scheme allowed Lincoln to access, use, and abuse the empowerments of the actual Public Office with nobody being the wiser.

The military unknowingly accepted Lincoln as Commander-in-Chief, an office attached to the actual Public Office, and never questioned his authority.

This allowed Lincoln, an Undeclared Foreign Agent, to promote and conduct the entire illegal and unlawful Mercenary Conflict we know as The American Civil War, and also allowed him to promote dictatorial powers for the Office of Commander-in-Chief and the use of so-called “Executive Orders” to commandeer both the military and the civilian government offices.

The Perpetrators were so pleased with this Substitution Scheme in America, that they literally created Offices of the Commander-in-Chief throughout the Commonwealth— as documented by Dick Yardley in Australia– so they could make use of this template to undermine the lawful national governments throughout the British Commonwealth countries, too.

The problem, of course, is that Lincoln was never the lawful Commander-in-Chief, and had no possible standing or authority to occupy the offices of our American Government to begin with, including the Office of the Commander-in-Chief.

Both the original prohibitions against foreign conflicts of interest and the Titles of Nobility Amendment ratified in 1819 made sure of that.

So while the British Monarch could raise their pen and create a brand new Office of the Commander-in-Chief in Australia or South Africa or any other British Commonwealth, and then use that office to take over the military and subourn the lawful civilian government, the original template for all this grossly unlawful activity by commercial corporation personnel— all undertaken in breach of trust and contract — was provided by Abraham Lincoln acting forty years before the events in Australia.

We wish for Dick Yardley’s claim to be incorporated into and made part of our claim on behalf of our nation-states of the Union and living claimants worldwide, who have suffered from the same evils, and the same undermining of the national governments at the hands of commercial corporations under contract to provide essential government services.

We wish for his claim on behalf of Australia to be extended generally to all the Commonwealth nations pending further research.

We already know that these Commonwealth nations were all similarly impacted by this same gross breach of trust and violation of service contracts, including but not limited to the individual national Constitutions, and we also know that the imposition of new offices of the Commander-in-Chief were instrumental in all cases wherein these nations had standing defence forces of their own.

Lincoln was never validly “Commander-in-Chief” and thus, everything he did devolved into fraud.

He committed gross breach of trust and commercial service contract and, yes, treason in conflict of interest.

As he personally “declared” war on the Southern States-of-States without any Public Office and without any Congressional Declaration, the responsibility for the destruction and the loss of life and everything else associated with The American Civil War, rests upon the British Crown and the British Monarch and the Principals responsible.

Likewise the breach of trust and service contracts visited upon the Commonwealth nations rests on the same Parties, promoting and extending a known criminal fraud scheme against the countries and people of the Commonwealth nations.

We wish for the immediate return of all vested authority to the control of elected national governments and the end of illegal territorial occupation, that is, occupation by mercenary forces in the employment of the Municipal Corporations and their franchises and agencies discussed throughout.

We wish for disclosure to the General Public and announcement of Public Elections and an end to private political party elections being substituted for legitimate Public Elections.

Petition of Rights
David Walter

Australian Tax Office ATO
does not exist

A barrister in Sydney presented this information to a Judicial Registrar who was hearing a liquidation proceeding.

The Registrar adjourned the case immediately, after appearing “visibly shaken”.

Only a matter of hours later, an airline pilot who is in the Federal Court in Melbourne, against the A.T.O., was contacted by solicitors representing that august body, and informed that they were not proceeding with the case.

I wonder why?

I quote from an earlier F.O.I. Act request asking for “.. certified copies of the documents that establish the Australian Taxation Office”.

In response, Mr. R. J. Tomkins, (A.T.O. Solicitor), reports:

“With regards the creation of the Australian Taxation Office (A.T.O.), I was able to ascertain that the A.T.O was created as a branch of the Commonwealth Public Service by an executive instrument in 1973.

Officers of the Commonwealth Public Service are assigned to the A.T.O and the Commissioner of Taxation is put in charge of those Officers by section 25(4) of the Public Service Act 1922.

“An extensive search of the A.T.O. library and records management system failed to identify any document relevant to this part of your request.

Similarly, enquiries to the Commissioner’s Office, People and Structures Branch, The Delegations and Authorisations Officer and the Parliamentary Business Unit did not identify any document.

“On the advice of the Australian Government Solicitor’s Office, I contacted the Office of the Official Secretary to the Governor-General in an attempt to identify, and obtain a copy of the executive instrument.

This office referred me to the Federal Executive Council who then suggested I contact Australian Archives.

A detailed search by all offices failed to locate the relevant document.

“Accordingly, I am obliged in terms of section 24A of the Act to deny access to this part of your application on the grounds that I was not able to locate the requested document”.

It was from this original F.O.I. Act request, that the I.T.R. was eventually able to identify that the A.T.O. was never legally formed, and therefore, has been illegally illiciting taxes since its formation!

The I.T.R. takes the view that all the tax laws in the country are illegal anyway, (under an illegal Constitution), and that therefore, taxes are voluntary.

Copy of Letter from
Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT I am a former member of the High Court and I wish to take this unusual method of informing you about a matter that is going to deeply affect us all. Unfortunately, a document such as this is too easily “lost” in the bureaucratic jungle in which we operate.

A group of Australian Citizens have taken it upon themselves to test the validity of our current political and judicial system.

Like you, I have lived my entire legal career with the assumption that the basis for our legal and political system, state and federal, was written in stone.

This group has undertaken to present this paper when they test the legal system.

The group is articulate, well educated and counts some of our best legal minds amongst its members.

One of Australia’s best known barristers is one of the group’s leading lights.

It is far better informed with regard to international law than most members of the judiciary or for that matter, the legal academe.

It has better international contacts than I would have thought possible.

After spending some time with the group leader, I was able to elicit its primary intentions.

It is the introduction of a totally democratic system of government devoid of party politics operated by the will of the people incorporating a system of debit taxation which should go a long way to eliminating the current unemployment problem and also addressing other pressing social issues.

An Australian Bureau of Statistics model supports the proposal.

The group has so far concentrated on matters relating to taxation, state and federal, minor industrial and motor traffic while undertaking not to present a criminal defence using their current presentation.

I challenged the leader of this group to present any evidence he had with regard to the above defence so I could use my legal expertise to play the part of the devil’s advocate.

It should be brought to your attention that the group has access to documentation that we members of the judiciary have little knowledge.

I refer to the British Parliamentary Papers for the Colony of Australia for the years 1860 through to 1922.

These are photocopies of all documents correspondence etc., between the states and later the Commonwealth of Australia, the British Crown and the British Government. They are very revealing documents and indicate the degree of chicanery in which the politicians of all shades were involved and as I can now see, at the expense of the legal academe and the judiciary.

I present for your perusal the details of the group’s presentation along with my comment on each major item.

The group relies solely upon historical fact and rejects political rhetoric and legal opinion unless based upon historical fact.

1. “The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) is an act of the parliament of the United Kingdom. It did not contain any substance of sovereignty and was a colonial act centralising self-government of the six Australian Colonies. Australia remained a colony of the United Kingdom.”

1a. Although the late Lionel Murphy attempted to show that there was an element of sovereignty in this act he failed. The international definition of sovereignty has been espoused at length and the above act although important in the development of Australia, did not have the authority of sovereignty. The historical evidence that Australia remained a British Colony post 1901 is overwhelming. Page 1 Copy of Letter from Sir Harry Gibbs

2. “Australia made an international declaration of its intention to become a sovereign nation when Prime Minister Hughes and his deputy; Sir Joseph Cook signed the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. On its cognisance of signing this treaty, Australia was granted a “C” class League of Nations mandate over former German territories in the Pacific.

In effect, Papua New Guinea became a colony of Australia achieving its own independence on 16 September 1975. The League of Nations became part of International Law on 10 January 1920 with Article X of the Covenant of League of Nations guaranteeing the sovereignty of each member,”

2A. The Significance of Australia joining the League of Nations as a foundation member has never been addressed in Australia before. Strangely, only one book has ever examined the question of Australian independence. Written by W. J. Hudson and M. P. Sharp in 1988 “Australian Independence” printed by Melbourne University Press.

As both were members of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade at the time of authorship and had access to the, British Parliamentary Papers, I find it most interesting they have avoided any mention of these papers in their book. Their conclusion that Australia became an independent nation via. the Statute of Westminster in 1931 flies in the face of contradictory evidence within the above mentioned papers and readily available historical fact.

Prime Minister Hughes address to the Commonwealth Parliament on 10 September 1919, “Australia has now entered into a family of nations on a footing of equality. Australia has been born in a blood sacrifice.” demonstrates the politicians of the day were only too well aware of the change of status from a colony to that of sovereign nation while attempting to remain within the Empire.

Prime Minister Bruce made this reply to the British Government in 1922 after a request for troops against Kernel Ataturk in the Chanak crisis.

Bruce’s reply is contained in the British Parliamentary Papers: “We have to try to ensure there shall be an Empire foreign policy which if we are to be in anyway responsible for it, must be one to which we agree and have assented. If we are to take any responsibility for the Empire’s foreign policy, there must be a better system, so that we may be consulted and have a better opportunity to express the views of the people of this country. We cannot blindly submit to any policy which may involve us in war.”

This is a far cry from the declaration of war against Germany made on behalf of the British Colony of Australia by George V of the United Kingdom in 1914.

I have re-produced Bruce’s reply in full as I believe this reply contains clear historical evidence of a Prime Minister who was well aware of the change of status from a. colony to a sovereign nation.

The later Statute of Westminster 1931 was an acknowledgment of that status.

3. “Paragraph 4 of the Statue of Westminster Act 1931 contravenes Article X of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Paragraph 1 of the Australia Act 1986 contravenes Article 2 paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Charter of the United Nations.”

3A Paragraph 4 of the Statute of Westminster reads “No Act of Parliament of the United. Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to a Dominion as part of the law of that Dominion, unless it is expressly declared in that Act that Dominion, has requested, and consented to the enactment thereof.”

Paragraph 1 of the Australia Act is very similar: “No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Copy of Letter from Sir Harry Gibbs Act shall extend, or be deemed to extend, to the Commonwealth, to a State or Territory as part of the law of the Commonwealth, of the State or of the Territory.”

I passed this one to the Federal Attorney General and asked him what was the source of this quite incredible authority that sought to overturn the authority legislated within the Covenant of the League of Nations in Article X and the Charter of the United Nations in Article 2 paragraphs 1 and 4.

He is unable to provide any documentation to support these clauses, Article X of the Covenant of the League of Nations states: “The members of the League undertake to respect and preserve against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence of all Members of the League. In case of any such aggression or in case of any threat or danger of such aggression, the Council shall advise upon the means by which this obligation shall be fulfilled.”

It is appropriate that I now introduce a statement by Sir Geoffrey Butler KBE, MA and Fellow, Librarian and Lecturer in International Law and Diplomacy of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge author of “A Handbook to-the League of Nations” used as a reference to the League by virtually all nations at that time.

He refers to Article 1 of the Covenant of the League of Nations.

“It is arguable that this article is the Covenant’s most significant single measure.

By it the British Dominions, namely New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, and Canada, have their independent nationhood established for the first time.

There may be friction over small matters in giving effect to this internationally acknowledged fact but the Dominions will always look to the League of Nations Covenant as their Declaration of Independence. Article 2 paragraph 1 of the United Nation’s Charter states “The Organisation is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.”

Article 2 paragraph 4 of the Charter states ‘All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”

In view of the above, the historical evidence for Australian Independence by 10 January 1920 when the League of Nations became part of International Law is overwhelming. When this evidence is reinforced with the contents of the Charter of the United Nations, the continued usage of any legislation that owes its very legitimacy to the parliament of an acknowledged foreign power cannot be supported by either legal opinion or indeed historical evidence.

I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in Australia and its States and Territories has no basis in law.

Following discussions with members of the British Government relating to the Letters Patent for the Governor General and State Governors I find that these documents no longer have any authority.

Indeed, the Queen of the United, Kingdom is excluded from any position of power in Australia by the United Nations Charter and is excluded under UK law from the issue of a Letters Patent to other than a British Subject.

A Letters Patent must refer to an action to be taken with regard to British Citizens.

The Immigration Act. 1972 UK defines Australian Citizen as aliens.

The Governor General’s Letters Patent is a comedy of errors.

We are greeted in the name of the Queen of Australia who suddenly becomes the Queen of the United Kingdom in the next paragraph.

This Queen the gives instructions to the Governor General with reference to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK.

Here we have a clear breach of Article 2 paragraph 1 of the United Nation Charter.

Under both UK and international law, the-Queen is a British Citizen.

State Governors are in a worse position as their authority comes from the late Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom.

Regardless of the validity of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK, if the authority of Governor General and the State Governors is invalid then so is the entire political and legal system of government.

When advised that the War Crimes Commission was taking an interest, I called them in Geneva.

Under the 1947 Geneva Convention, they are empowered to look into eases here in Australia where it is alleged the law of a foreign country was enforced against a citizen of a member state of the United Nations. As they perceive that only the judiciary can actually enforce the law, the judiciary becomes their target.

The group has already placed cases before them which they ate currently investigating.

If found guilty, the penalties are horrific and include the death penalty!

I could go on with more relevant information however I think now is the time for a summary.

The group leader, a QC, states the obvious when he asked me how could a colony now acknowledged by all world nations to be a sovereign Nation retain exactly the same legal and political system it enjoyed as a colony without any change whatsoever to the basis for law.

This point alone requires an answer.

The High Court has already answered with regard to the position held by treaties signed by the Commonwealth Government in the Teoh case of 1994. “Ordinary people have the right to expect government officials to consider Australia’s international obligations even if those obligations are not reflected in specific Acts of Parliament: the rights recognised in international treaties are an implied limit on executive processes.”

My advice is to adjourn any case “sine die” that that challenges the authority of the Letters Patent. Under no circumstances hear a case that challenges the validity of a State or the Federal Constitution.

It is the politicians who are using us as pawns without them having to face the music.

These matters are of concern to politicians, let them sort out these problems and accept any inherent risks themselves ! Article 36 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice is the correct reference for you to refuse to hear a matter when an international treaty is cited as a defence.

Things you didn’t know
about
Australian capital cities.

The global elite originally set up the parliament building in Canberra as their central seat of government to rule the planet.

The US intelligence headquarters is not in Langley, Virginia, but in Melbourne, Australia.

Central Australia is the base of the world’s major underground facilities, built as underground hotels from which the global world can be searched and run.

Below Canberra there are many levels of draconian bases accessible by submarine and spaceship landing in the lake in front of Parliament House (Lake Burley Griffen).

Beneath the lake, they access the many levels that are below the Australian Parliament Building.

Beneath Uluru (Ayers Rock) in central Australia is the world’s largest dark genetic cloning lab.

Located in Australia, Under Pine Gap is the world’s most important UFO surveillance facility used by the systems elite.

Most children conceived in underground facilities are under Sydney’s suburbs.

Then they are taken to Circular Quay Harburg in Sydney and transported via P&O Cruise Lines around the world to places like New York, LA, the Middle East and Europe for use in satanic sacrificial rituals, child hunting and adrenochrome harvesting.

Australia has a MASSIVE underground tunnel system and is dotted with DRACON bases, all connected by major tunnel systems built many years ago using draconian ET technology.

Tunnels from Melbourne lead directly to Tasmania and from Tasmania to Antarctica.

Tunnels from Sydney lead to New Zealand and Norfolk Island.

Tunnels from Sydney lead to Canberra and from Canberra to Pine Gap and Uluru (Ayers Rock) and also to Melbourne.

Tunnels from Perth (Geraldton) in Western Australia lead directly to South Africa.

Tunnels from Darwin lead to Indonesia.

MINERALS minded underground from under Coober Pedy in South Australia are by ANCHORED HUMAN SLAVES and then shipped directly to Alpha Draconis.

Australia is not what most people think it is.

Australia was an important GLOBAL stronghold for the Dark Ones.

The underground fighting was very tough.

The Special Forces & The Galactic Federation have won and completely eradicated evil from under Australia.

🇦🇺Now you also know why Australia was called Down Under