click this image for video
click the above below for ALL
website-page navigation buttons
or scroll down to continue
Go to Rabbit Hole Grand Central for links to all pages
City of London built on Rome
City of London
The City of London (i.e. the square mile in Greater London) is not technically part of Greater London or England, just as the Vatican is not part of Rome or Italy. Similarly, Washington, D.C., is not part of the United States, which it controls. These three entities have one goal — to end the old world order of sovereign nations and usher in a new global world order under one government rule under the iron fist of the Cabal.
These sovereign legal entities have their own laws and individuality, as well as their own flags.
Pay attention to the three stars on the flag of Washington, they represent the trinity of these three city-states, also known as the Empire of Cities (the number 3 also has great esoteric significance).
The governments of the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom are subsidiaries of the Crown, as is the Federal Reserve in the United States. The reigning monarch in England is also subordinate to the crown. The global financial and legal system is controlled by the Queen from the City of London.
The square mile that makes up the center of Greater London is the center of world power, at least on a visible level.
Washington was founded as a city-state in 1871 with the adoption of the Act of 1871, which officially established the United States as a corporation under the authority of Washington, which itself is subordinate to the City of London.
Corporations are run by presidents, which is why we call a person who is considered to hold the highest position in the country "president".
The fact is that the president is nothing but a figurehead for the heads of central banks and multinational corporations (both of which are controlled by the Highest Spiritual Freemasonry), who really control this country and, ultimately, lead it.
Washington operates within the framework of the Roman law system and outside the restrictions established by the US Constitution.
Papal states are territories on the east coast of the former United States under the sovereign direct rule of the Pope from the fall of the United States at the turn of the twentieth century to the present day. The Papal Region is one of the regional powers of the Chesapeake Bay, controlling the city of Washington, as well as most of its surroundings. The Pope also owns several cities, baronies and other possessions outside of Washington, creating a complex network of possessions that pay tribute directly to the pope.
The Papal region originated on the territory of the former United States, which the modern world views as an ancient empire and a continent-generating government. After the violent coup in Washington, Chester Hale Fitzgerald founded the Papal Region based on the beliefs of a new religion, which later became Unionism. However, the Pope claims that his power comes from the American Empire, which allegedly gave the first Pope full power over the empire through the Gift of Lincoln, a fake American imperial decree. Since then, this document has been used to support the papacy's claims to political power.
A corporation called Washington, D.C., is now a foreign legal entity on the American soil of sovereign states. It was created at the expense of the Vatican when the District of Columbia was transferred to the city-state and it is a legal entity. The Vatican and other foreign states that intervened, such as Germany, Italy, China, etc. are now enemies of the state, and their assets should be confiscated.
The entire territory of the corporate Capitol was laid out by secret societies in the form of a pentagram that honours the god they follow — the god Baal/Baal, who sacrifices children.
It's sad, but it's true.
Everything that is hidden will become known.
How Britain stole
$45 trillion from India
And lied about it
by Dr Jason Hickel
There is a story that is commonly told in Britain that the colonisation of India – as horrible as it may have been – was not of any major economic benefit to Britain itself.
If anything, the administration of India was a cost to Britain.
So the fact that the empire was sustained for so long – the story goes – was a gesture of Britain’s benevolence.
New research by the renowned economist Utsa Patnaik – just published by Columbia University Press – deals a crushing blow to this narrative.
Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938.
It’s a staggering sum.
For perspective, $45 trillion is 17 times more than the total annual gross domestic product of the United Kingdom today.
How did this come about?
It happened through the trade system.
Prior to the colonial period, Britain bought goods like textiles and rice from Indian producers and paid for them in the normal way – mostly with silver – as they did with any other country.
But something changed in 1765, shortly after the East India Company took control of the subcontinent and established a monopoly over Indian trade.
Here’s how it worked.
The East India Company began collecting taxes in India, and then cleverly used a portion of those revenues (about a third) to fund the purchase of Indian goods for British use.
In other words, instead of paying for Indian goods out of their own pocket, British traders acquired them for free, “buying” from peasants and weavers using money that had just been taken from them.
It was a scam – theft on a grand scale.
Yet most Indians were unaware of what was going on because the agent who collected the taxes was not the same as the one who showed up to buy their goods.
Had it been the same person, they surely would have smelled a rat.
Some of the stolen goods were consumed in Britain, and the rest were re-exported elsewhere.
The re-export system allowed Britain to finance a flow of imports from Europe, including strategic materials like iron, tar and timber, which were essential to Britain’s industrialisation.
Indeed, the Industrial Revolution depended in large part on this systematic theft from India.
On top of this, the British were able to sell the stolen goods to other countries for much more than they “bought” them for in the first place, pocketing not only 100 percent of the original value of the goods but also the markup.
After the British Raj took over in 1858, colonisers added a special new twist to the tax-and-buy system.
As the East India Company’s monopoly broke down, Indian producers were allowed to export their goods directly to other countries.
But Britain made sure that the payments for those goods nonetheless ended up in London.
How did this work? Basically, anyone who wanted to buy goods from India would do so using special Council Bills – a unique paper currency issued only by the British Crown.
And the only way to get those bills was to buy them from London with gold or silver.
So traders would pay London in gold to get the bills, and then use the bills to pay Indian producers.
When Indians cashed the bills in at the local colonial office, they were “paid” in rupees out of tax revenues – money that had just been collected from them.
So, once again, they were not in fact paid at all; they were defrauded.
Meanwhile, London ended up with all of the gold and silver that should have gone directly to the Indians in exchange for their exports.
This corrupt system meant that even while India was running an impressive trade surplus with the rest of the world – a surplus that lasted for three decades in the early 20th century – it showed up as a deficit in the national accounts because the real income from India’s exports was appropriated in its entirety by Britain.
After Queen Elizabeth II’s death, many Indians demand return of Kohinoor diamond
Shortly after the death of British monarch Queen Elizabeth II on Sept. 8, the word “Kohinoor” began trending on Indian Twitter.
It was one of the most famous gemstones. The Kohinoor diamond is just one of 2,800 stones set into the crown made for Elizabeth’s mother, known as the Queen Mother – but the 105-carat oval brilliant is the proverbial jewel in the crown.
COUNCILS HAVE NO AUTHORITY
to charge 'rates'...
In 1974 and 1988 Australians voted in referendums
that asked if we would like to approve Local Government.
There was a resounding
NO to both referendums.
To circumvent the Will of the People. State Governments
brought In state Acts authorizing local councils as a third tier of government.
They completely ignored the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act 1001. Section 100 that states.
‘When a law of a State
is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth,
the latter shall prevail,
and the format shall,
to the extent of the inconsistency be invalid’.
When we the People of the Commonwealth of Australia
vote in a referendum the result is Constitutional Law.
This means that any State law that is inconsistent
with it is Null and Void, it has no authority, no power.
It cannot be
It is that simple
This means that Local Councils are just that
They are not and cannot be a third tier of government.
Nor can they levy taxes.
No matter how they disguise those taxes
with words like 'council rates', 'land rates',
or even 'administration’ charges.
They cannot levy taxes....no ’ifs’, ‘and's’ or ‘but's’.
It is up to each member of the Commonwealth of Australia,
that's you and me to stand up to these unlawful
State governments and their little dog local councils
and soy NO! - I will not pay your unlawful
Rates or Parking fines, or Animal Registration Fees.
Those and all the other ‘fees’ they,
(want to), charge. have no basis in law
... they are all inconsistent with Commonwealth Law
We the People have a right and a duty to Lawfully Rebel.
Article 61 in the Magna Carta states
we must never bow down to bullies
criminals and traitors.
click image for video
THE STRAWMAN PROCESS
PART 1 - WHY DID
YOUR STRAWMAN GET BORN
click image for video
THE STRAWMAN PROCESS
AN EXERCISE IN
click image for video
THIS IS SO MUCH MORE!
CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED
The Observation Deck is a channel which explores lesser known views on many subjects. From history to the roots of modern scientific facts and theories. Rather than seek to change the minds of subscribers, I simply pose views some may not have considered and leave the rest up to you.
I guess it actually is "For elucidation purposes only" and I hope you enjoy your journey of self-discovery and much as I do.
My opinions about the content are simply that, my opinions, and should not be taken as fact but rather as additional information you can form your own opinions about.
As the saying goes...
"I don't want you to think like me, I just want you to think."
We live in a universe of impossible possibilities and the Observation Deck acts as a vehicle to explore the known and unknowable in equal amounts.
click image for video
FINES, INFRINGEMENT NOTICES
In this video the truth is exposed about the fraudulent and criminal processes used by banks to supposedly lend money to purchase land and houses.
Do you really have a 'mortgage'? How do you protect you hard worked for property?
There's a whole channel of videos
like this on YouTube channel
click image for video
HOW THEY LEND YOU BACK
YOUR OWN MONEY
AND STEAL YOUR PROPERTY
click image for video
How Banks Enslave Humanity
WHAT THE HISTORIANS
NEGLECT TO MENTION
Idolised as the guy who almost single handedly 'saved' Britain from tyranny.
Except - there's evidence he was probably an alcoholic homosexual pedophile, (which, it seems, is the 'norm' for English aristocracy - even to this day), who was owned by the Rothschilds who instructed him to pal up with Roosevelt and Stalin to start a war with Germany, they the Rothschilds would finance both 'sides' of.
And all because Hitler refused to put a Rothschilds central bank into Germany so they could control it's economy and rob it's people blind as they have done with the rest of the world.
This war destroyed just about everything on the planet which had to be rebuilt, (again), by companies owned by you-know-who and cost the lives of around 66-million people. (See that number) When the war was 'won' UK, USA and Russia got to divi up Europe between them and make out a 'cold' war was still going on so they could keep buying weapons off of companies owned by guess who?
D-Day landings, which commenced at 6 a.m on the 6th day of the 6th. Month, started the mop-up process. (666)
Oh! and at the carve-up he and Roosevelt gave Palestine to the jews to create Israel - as per the Balfour agreement of 1917, (BEFORE the end of WW1), and then used UK troops to help them genocide the resident Palestinians to make room for them.
USA got a flattened Japan and Germany - which is how they got to be rebuilt into manufacturing powerhouses so quickly.
Don't believe this?
How come UK made out went into war to protect Poland but gave Poland to Russia at the end of it?
The reality is, this guy was a traitor/monster who caused the deaths of millions of people - ably assisted by Stalin. His treachery has been transformed by a corrupt system of controllers throughout history to support their narrative.
It's reputed that Churchill was a drug-addicted alcoholic paedophile - hardly capable of a lucid thought.
His bloodline in the English aristocracy along with his financial status when his father died when has was about age 21, (broke, with no prospect of a financial future), made him a perfect puppet for the Rothschilds - who were close friends and associates of his father - who educated, funded and groomed him and put him in the position of power they needed for him to start WW2 destroy Europe, (and blame Hitler), and create Israel.
He even provided English troops to assist in the cleansing of the original inhabitants of Palestine to make room for the influx of Jewish refugees seeking a new home at the end of WW2.
That he got elevated to 'hero' status after the end of WW2 until his death, (which earned him a state funeral), is a testament to power the Rothschilds have in burying the truth of history and crating their own narrative - it's the 'victors' that write the history we live with.
Throw in a few well-written biographies by paid stooges, and few people, to this day, have any notion about Churchill's real contribution, or lack of it, to humanity.
Don't miss the video 'Europa' above for some information about this.
Crimes Winston Churchill committed
that have been conveniently
overlooked by history
This website is always
'work in progress'
please report broken links
Send files or messages direct to
Browse in safety
this website does not collect
any information or leave cookies