City of London

The City of London (i.e. the square mile in Greater London) is not technically part of Greater London or England, just as the Vatican is not part of Rome or Italy. Similarly, Washington, D.C., is not part of the United States, which it controls. These three entities have one goal — to end the old world order of sovereign nations and usher in a new global world order under one government rule under the iron fist of the Cabal.

These sovereign legal entities have their own laws and individuality, as well as their own flags.

Pay attention to the three stars on the flag of Washington, they represent the trinity of these three city-states, also known as the Empire of Cities (the number 3 also has great esoteric significance).

The governments of the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom are subsidiaries of the Crown, as is the Federal Reserve in the United States. The reigning monarch in England is also subordinate to the crown. The global financial and legal system is controlled by the Queen from the City of London.

The square mile that makes up the center of Greater London is the center of world power, at least on a visible level.

Washington was founded as a city-state in 1871 with the adoption of the Act of 1871, which officially established the United States as a corporation under the authority of Washington, which itself is subordinate to the City of London.

Corporations are run by presidents, which is why we call a person who is considered to hold the highest position in the country “president”.

The fact is that the president is nothing but a figurehead for the heads of central banks and multinational corporations (both of which are controlled by the Highest Spiritual Freemasonry), who really control this country and, ultimately, lead it.

Washington operates within the framework of the Roman law system and outside the restrictions established by the US Constitution.

Papal states are territories on the east coast of the former United States under the sovereign direct rule of the Pope from the fall of the United States at the turn of the twentieth century to the present day. The Papal Region is one of the regional powers of the Chesapeake Bay, controlling the city of Washington, as well as most of its surroundings. The Pope also owns several cities, baronies and other possessions outside of Washington, creating a complex network of possessions that pay tribute directly to the pope.

The Papal region originated on the territory of the former United States, which the modern world views as an ancient empire and a continent-generating government. After the violent coup in Washington, Chester Hale Fitzgerald founded the Papal Region based on the beliefs of a new religion, which later became Unionism. However, the Pope claims that his power comes from the American Empire, which allegedly gave the first Pope full power over the empire through the Gift of Lincoln, a fake American imperial decree. Since then, this document has been used to support the papacy’s claims to political power.

A corporation called Washington, D.C., is now a foreign legal entity on the American soil of sovereign states. It was created at the expense of the Vatican when the District of Columbia was transferred to the city-state and it is a legal entity. The Vatican and other foreign states that intervened, such as Germany, Italy, China, etc. are now enemies of the state, and their assets should be confiscated.

The entire territory of the corporate Capitol was laid out by secret societies in the form of a pentagram that honours the god they follow — the god Baal/Baal, who sacrifices children.

It’s sad, but it’s true.

Everything that is hidden will become known.

How Britain stole
$45 trillion from India
And lied about it

by Dr Jason Hickel

There is a story that is commonly told in Britain that the colonisation of India – as horrible as it may have been – was not of any major economic benefit to Britain itself.

If anything, the administration of India was a cost to Britain.

So the fact that the empire was sustained for so long – the story goes – was a gesture of Britain’s benevolence.

New research by the renowned economist Utsa Patnaik – just published by Columbia University Press – deals a crushing blow to this narrative.

Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938.

It’s a staggering sum.

For perspective, $45 trillion is 17 times more than the total annual gross domestic product of the United Kingdom today.

How did this come about?

It happened through the trade system.

Prior to the colonial period, Britain bought goods like textiles and rice from Indian producers and paid for them in the normal way – mostly with silver – as they did with any other country.

But something changed in 1765, shortly after the East India Company took control of the subcontinent and established a monopoly over Indian trade.

Here’s how it worked.

The East India Company began collecting taxes in India, and then cleverly used a portion of those revenues (about a third) to fund the purchase of Indian goods for British use.

In other words, instead of paying for Indian goods out of their own pocket, British traders acquired them for free, “buying” from peasants and weavers using money that had just been taken from them.

It was a scam – theft on a grand scale.

Yet most Indians were unaware of what was going on because the agent who collected the taxes was not the same as the one who showed up to buy their goods.

Had it been the same person, they surely would have smelled a rat.

Some of the stolen goods were consumed in Britain, and the rest were re-exported elsewhere.

The re-export system allowed Britain to finance a flow of imports from Europe, including strategic materials like iron, tar and timber, which were essential to Britain’s industrialisation.

Indeed, the Industrial Revolution depended in large part on this systematic theft from India.

On top of this, the British were able to sell the stolen goods to other countries for much more than they “bought” them for in the first place, pocketing not only 100 percent of the original value of the goods but also the markup.

After the British Raj took over in 1858, colonisers added a special new twist to the tax-and-buy system.

As the East India Company’s monopoly broke down, Indian producers were allowed to export their goods directly to other countries.

But Britain made sure that the payments for those goods nonetheless ended up in London.

How did this work? Basically, anyone who wanted to buy goods from India would do so using special Council Bills – a unique paper currency issued only by the British Crown.

And the only way to get those bills was to buy them from London with gold or silver.

So traders would pay London in gold to get the bills, and then use the bills to pay Indian producers.

When Indians cashed the bills in at the local colonial office, they were “paid” in rupees out of tax revenues – money that had just been collected from them.

So, once again, they were not in fact paid at all; they were defrauded.

Meanwhile, London ended up with all of the gold and silver that should have gone directly to the Indians in exchange for their exports.

This corrupt system meant that even while India was running an impressive trade surplus with the rest of the world – a surplus that lasted for three decades in the early 20th century – it showed up as a deficit in the national accounts because the real income from India’s exports was appropriated in its entirety by Britain.

After Queen Elizabeth II’s death, many Indians demand return of Kohinoor diamond

Shortly after the death of British monarch Queen Elizabeth II on Sept. 8, the word “Kohinoor” began trending on Indian Twitter.

It was one of the most famous gemstones. The Kohinoor diamond is just one of 2,800 stones set into the crown made for Elizabeth’s mother, known as the Queen Mother – but the 105-carat oval brilliant is the proverbial jewel in the crown.