click this image for video
click the image below for ALL
website-page navigation buttons
or scroll down to continue
Go to Rabbit Hole Grand Central for links to all pages
Click ink for Website
We are working as diligently
and as busy on the other side
as we are in this perspective:
Which is why it is very important for us to not to sleep deprive and to get the rest when you need it your work on the other side is just as important as it is here:
Remember when you fall asleep each night you temporarily die you assume your true form your soul form:
You are merely tied to your physical body by a silver cord but you venture across space time and all that is the universe the moment you fall asleep time does not exist on that side time is irrelevant:
The past the present and the future can all be accessed from your lightbody Nikola Tesla also knew about this:
This is because they knew that in your rem sleep state you can access memories:
You can visit the past, present or future potential timelines time travel does not exist in the physical it exists in the spiritual and these beings have been hiding and using this knowledge, along with looking glass technology to future predict and prepare for a far ahead trajectory of potential timelines:
It’s just now becoming new info to most they used it to enslave us all:
This information is finally going around and becoming more well known and people are beginning to put the puzzle pieces together that we aren’t a physical body having a spiritual experience:
We are spirits having a human experience and all the technology we encounter in our lives is all programmed and designed to supress your ability to understand what you are and what you can do:
You have to constantly remind yourself the biggest key of all of this knowledge is focus an intent what you put your energy and intent behind Is the only real vote in anything that actually counts:
Being a co creator of this reality your voice matters and it counts:
So this is why you must always question the public’s opinion and or expression because the majority of them have been programmed to forget who and what they are:
And the rest are background filler space
Those unique the ones who stand out the ones who are either really weird or really creative, expressive those are your soul bearing humans:
Some of them are not even human but they are alien light beings who have incarnated into this experience as a human:
To either help or prolong the process of ascension that is taking place you must be conscious entirely of what your mindset and focus is at all times:
Which is difficult for all of us even those who are pretty awake:
Focus is tough in a world of distraction:
But your intent and your focus is what co creates our reality we have enough awake that are controlling the matrix experience:
But they are so distracted and so not in alignment that we are on a rollercoaster of emotions and experiences because we can’t yet, collectively align:
It’s going to be one of the hardest things human beings have ever done:
Align and focus:
Learn keep it simple, align the trajectory of their focus and intent and be patient enough to watch the process unfold without getting distracted:
The answer to all of this is very simple:
Yet it is the most difficult thing for us to achieve because our entire lives were programmed to rid our conscious awareness of this, they have us pinned by division:
When enough people get fed up, when enough people begin to see the patterns, when enough people choose the same potential future outcome of how they choose to live we then will implement radical noticeable changes that will be very hard to deny, by even the hardest of naysayers:
Such a subtle thing such as the conscious suppressing signals we are faced with is a difficult thing for most to understand simply because they can’t see it:
It has to be shown to them in some way for them to fully understand it:
But just like Neo once you see, you can never unsee:
You can never go back to your days of blissful ignorance and there will be a portion of the collective that will choose this:
But that doesn’t mean we don’t explain their options and give them the chance to understand deeper:
How they decide is then their choice:
We came here to wreck shop, to undo what has been done:
We came here to fix the broken, to forgive ourselves and our handlers and to give then the option to make good with god before the shift:
We carry nobody else’s burdens but our own from this point on, they will either choose higher awareness or they will choose the remainder of the 3d experience until they learn:
Maybe one more lifetime at best in this awareness:
Once the next round of incarnated come through and this world isn’t fixed they will likely wake up transhuman and have to live in the worst parts of this timeline because that is what they choose:
When enough souls have been sorted the gates will eventually lock and the matter of this entire experience and all within it will return to mother Gaia:
Recycled back to sources:
Some food for thought:
By now you should see the trajectories:
The more we wake up others the quicker this process will unfold:
But the narrative, the collective mindset, is all still fed inorganically by synthetic signalling and people will continue to live in the matrix because that is all they ever choose to understand:
We volunteered as the suicide squad to come and drag as many souls out of this hell as we can before the experience concludes:
And all timelines converge and all dimensions merge:
And all that is left is the next experience for those who chose love:
Love you all:
Click PDF button for full article
Retired Judge Reveals All
By Judge Dale
STUFF YOU’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW
I didn’t plan on writing this but given the global movement in play to collapse the fiat financial dominance historically created and controlled by the Vatican; European Royal and Elite plus the retaliatory efforts by the United States Corporation to recoup their control of America; I felt a need to point out the flaws in their CORPORATE PROCESS.
You probably identify with this CORPORATE PROCESS as LEGAL PROCESS but it really isn’t about what is legal or lawful because all process is about the enforcement of CONTRACTS or the imposition and enforcement of CORPORATE REGULATIONS called STATUTES.
The best advice you will ever receive is to: AVOID THEIR COURTS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. There is NO justice to be found in those courts unless you are a member of the Vatican; the royal or Elite, or have purchased Diplomatic Immunity.
The only Constitutional Court in America is the International Court of Trades, which was created because no Foreign Nation Government would trade with the Corporate United States, until they provided a way for these foreign Nations to enforce their Trade Agreements with America.
NOTE: Historically, the World Court was created to provide Nations with a venue to enforce their Trade Agreements but the Corporate United States refused the Courts invitation to participate because they were denied control over the Court.
All of the other American Courts are pseudo courts or fictions and simply are Corporate Administrative Offices designed to resemble Courts and all of their Judges are simply Executive Administrations designed to resemble Judges.
The purpose of these pseudo Corporate Courts are only to settle contract disputes and since George Washington’s government was military in structure; if either party refuses to participate, these Courts cannot become involved and the dispute is dead in the water!
FRAUDS, LIARS, CRIMINALS
TRAITORS & FOOLS
Federal Judges must be appointed by the Governor-General and Stale Judges by the State Governors who must have been appointed by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second.
However, Privy Council and the Foreign & Commonwealth Office in London confirm that the Queen docs not and can not appoint the Governor-General nor the Governors because she is the Head of State of the United Kingdom and has no executive powers exercisable in the Commonwealth of Australia.
Therefore, any appointments made by these false representatives of the Queen are also fraudulent and those “Judges” have no authority or jurisdiction, whatsoever.
Common Law demands that an essential element in the creation of a contract is “certainty of terms”.
Variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty because ‘Variable” means “uncertain” and “certain” means “not variable” (Oxford English Dictionary).
However, Australian Judges say and maintain that variable interest rates are indeed certain.
That is a lie with which they conceal the illegality of variable interest rate loan contracts.
Australian Judges conceal 2 major counts of fraud committed by Banks.
The first is the fraud of variable interest rate loan contracts (above) and the second is the fact that Banks create money for themselves “om/ of thin air’ and inject it into the economy as loans, which they recoup with interest.
These fraudulent practices by the Banks amount to hundreds of billions of dollars and have resulted in the illegal dispossession of homes and businesses as well as bankruptcy, family breakdown, suicide and hardship to many ordinary Australians.
Australian Judges aid and abet in this atrocity.
Australian Judges swear to well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second and to do right to all manner of people without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.
In the Queen’s Coronation Oath, she promised to execute Law and Justice with Mercy in all her Judgments.
Apart from the Queen being the Head of State of a foreign power, Australian Judges betray that allegiance and betray the Australian People through their Corruption and the denial of Justice.
Listed in Australia’s Constitutional Enactments are Magna Carta 1297, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and Bill of Rights 1688 which guarantee the Right to Trial by Jury – the denial of which is punishable by 5 years imprisonment (Imperial Acts Application Act 1969, section 43).
Bill of Rights 1688 actually says that “counsellors, judges and ministers” who “subvert and extirpation the laws and liberties of the kingdom” are “evil”.
All evil-doers are fools.
Read this message…
They have now admitted that they
*DID NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY*
to remove the Great Seal In 1973.
Rod Culleton finally got a reply to the FOI request written 2 months ago to the Attorney – General for legality of the removal of the Great Seal of the Commonwealth in 1973.
The Great Seal is required to make Commonwealth law.
It is the most central thing to run Government and Parliament under the Constitution.
The answer came in yesterday morning
They have now admitted that they *DID NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY* to remove the Great Seal In 1973.
That means it’s ‘ILLEGAL & DONE IN TREASON* & every ACT since is NOT VALID LAW, NO AUTHORITY means there is NO LAW ever since.
The document received is the single most important thing to do blow every current government and parliament in Australia out of the water.
click button for video
HISTORY and INTRODUCTION
TO COMMON LAW
click image for video
The seven principles
of Natural Law
click image for video
Common law, Maritime Admiralty law
and the perversion of language…
video: Click image for video
WHAT IS YOUR STRAWMAN?
THE SLAVERY OF OUR TIME
Why the law does not work for you
Why you own nothing
including your house and car
even though you paid for them
Interviewed by Sean Stone
Go to website for FREE courses
video: Click image for video
Sick of getting petty fines and infringement notices?
Want to know the truth about them and how to deal with them?
Understand your rights and how you are being deceived.
video: Click image for video
Sick of paying
Car Registration and License fees?
Meet you Strawman PDF
Your strawman is a non-living fiction which uses a name which can easily be confused with your name. However, please don’t concern yourself about your strawman as it is only significant where there is Rule of Law and today I can’t think of anywhere in the world where there is Rule of Law.
There are two kinds of courts: Criminal Courts which have a jury and de facto courts which never have a jury.
De facto courts are private, seldom pay any attention to the facts in a case, and always find in the favour of the rich and unscrupulous.
click image for video
You are NOT a PERSON
GREAT video, simply
explains your rights
under common law
click image ABOVE for video
The (very convenient)
Great Fire Of London 1666
Few people are aware of the effect the Great Fire of London has had on their lives to this day.
It could be, after watching this video, you might consider that this event might have been one of the first ‘false-flag’ events our society has ever experienced.
The official story is that, on September 2nd, 1666, a tiny spark in a bakery oven in Pudding Lane, London, ignited the worst fire that London has ever seen – subsequently called the ‘Great Fire of London’.
The Great Fire of London burned for four days destroying all the mostly wooden built houses and buildings and the entire City had to be rebuilt from its ashes.
As official records of individuals were pretty much non-existent this event made it easy for King Charles II to declare everyone DEAD and claim ownership of all (their) property.
King Charles II also created the CESTUI QUE VIE (WHAT IS LIFE) ACT 1666 which declared all (dead) individuals as property of the crown as well and, as they say, the rest is just history …
The problem is that, without anyone being aware of it, this state of affairs persists to this day and ensures just about all people walking this earth do so in a state of permanent slavery, owning nothing – buried all their lives in debt they can never pay off.
This video describes what was going on behind the scenes in parliament and the act that took away our freedom and handed it to the state.
The convenience of the Great fire of London in 1666, only the following year after the ‘Great Plague’ of London was a major turning point in our history and how the matrix was started.
Was it really started in Pudding-Lane?
Did it really happen or was it one of the first ‘false-flags’/deceptions ever undertaken.
Mystery surrounds the event to this day but things don’t stay unsolved forever and new information is coming to light, we take a look behind the scenes at what the parliament was doing while London was burning.
As always do your own research and never take anyone’s word as gospel, always question the facts being presented in videos and come to your own conclusions about the facts being presented.
The Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666
Overstanding Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 –
Existence of Life
London in 1666, during the black plague and great fires of London, Parliament enacted an act behind closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666.
The act being debated was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women were declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea. (Back then operating in Admiralty law, the law of the sea, so lost at sea).
The state (London) took custody of everybody and their property into a trust and became the trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man comes back to reclaim those titles, he can also claim damages.
When CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a name this always refers to a legal entity/fiction, Company or Corporation no exceptions. e.g. John DOE or Doe: JANE
1) CESTUI QUE TRUST: (pronounced setakay) common term in New Zealand and Australia
2) STRAWMAN: common term in United States of America or Canada
These are the legal entity/fiction created and owned by the Government whom created it. It is like owning a share in the Stock Market, you may own a share… but it is still a share of the Stock.
Legally, we are considered to be a fiction, a concept or idea expressed as a name, a symbol.
That legal person has no consciousness; it is a juristic person, ENS LEGIS, a name/word written on a piece of paper. This traces back to 1666, London is an Independent, City, State, just like Vatican is an Independent City State, just like Washington, DC is an Independent City State.
The Crown is an unincorporated association.
The temple bar is in London, every lawyer called to the “bar” swears allegiance to the temple bar.
You can’t get called without swearing this allegiance.
Our only way out is to reclaim your dead entity (strawman) that the Crown created, become the executor and then collapse the called Cestui Que Vie trust and forgive yourself of your debts and then remove yourself from the admiralty law that holds you in custody.
When London burned during the Great Fire in 1666, the subrogation of men’s and women’s rights occurred.
The responsible act passed… CQV act 1666 meant all men and women of UK were declared dead and lost beyond the seas.
The state took everybody and everybody’s property into trust and takes control until a living man or woman comes back and claims their titles by proving they are alive and claims for damages can be made.
This is why you always need representation when involved in legal matters, because you’re dead.
The legal fiction is a construct on paper, an estate in trust.
When you get a bill or summons from court it is always in capital letters, similar to tomb stones in grave yards.
Capital letters signify death. (Grave-stones are always carved with capital letters)
They are writing to the dead legal fiction.
A legal fiction was created when someone informed the government that there was a new vessel in town, based upon your birth.
Birth Certificates are issued to us by the Doc. just as ships are given berth Certificates at the Dock.
It’s about commerce.
We come from our mothers waters.
Your mother has a birth canal just like a ship.
The ship moves by the sea current just as we are able to move by the currency.
All this information relates to how the general public are still legally tied through Maritime Admiralty Law.
Through this ancient legal construct we can be easily controlled and duped.
Learning about your legal fiction helps you to unlock yourself.
Otherwise you are just an empty vessel floating on the sea of commerce.
Parents are tricked into registering the birth of their babies.
In about 1837, the Births, Deaths and Marriages act was formed in UK and the post of registrar general was established. His job was to collect all the data from the churches which held the records of birth.
Regis from Queen or Crown
All people are seen to be in custody of,” The Crown”.
This allows people to function in commerce and to accept the benefits provided by state.
We have to understand who we are as men and women and how we can relate in the system.
The City of London is a centre for markets, where merchants work.
Then there is Mercantile Law. It comes from Admiralty Law.
Look at the symbols in your City Courts that relate to Admiralty.
So where you have commerce and money, you also have “justice” and “injury”.
You need to understand the bankruptcy before you can understand the judiciary.
We have accepted the claim to accept the summons, yet ONLY the dead can be summoned.
There is an obligation to accept any liability which has been created.
We are operating in Admiralty
A not guilty plea, or ANY plea admits jurisdiction.
The strawman, aka legal fiction is always guilty.
Barristers and solicitors make a living out of creating controversy.
By creating a controversy you become liable for the case.
Honour and dishonour
To remain in honour you have to accept a claim and settle (discharge) it.
Then you add conditions, ie. “I accept on proof of claim and proof of loss”.
This gives the liability back to them.
The legal fiction is always guilty.
Only in the High Court, can the real man or woman appear.
Games are played on courts, hence the name ‘court’.
It is a game with actors (acting on acts).
It has to be treated as a game and just business.
Court room dramas are misinformation.
In the public, we’re operating in bankruptcy and you receive benefits.
It takes a lot of time, effort and study to understand and use these tools.
You have to be prepared to go fully through the process, get the right tool out of your toolbox at the right time.
People need to learn how to act as a creation of God rather than a creation of Man.
CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST
YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE
IS A SLAVE CONTRACT WITH ROME
Cestui Que Vie Trust –
Your birth certificate
is a slave contract with Rome
What can we do . . . . .
We claim our birth-right and take back our Republic
David is a former Intelligence Officer, Former County Sheriff Deputy, Former Presidential Task Force Agent, and has also been helping people succeed in court for over 30 years.
He is educating us on the fraud that was perpetrated on us, “We the People” when we were born. He is teaching us about the differences between a US citizen and state national of your birth state located at 8 USC 1101(a)(21).
He is teaching us how to correct our status and take back our birth-right.
The Roman Catholic Church has a long history of tyranny and oppression.
Because of the desire to control through their inquisitions, they decided they would create the first express trust, called unum sanctum which was written on a papal bull and placed in their vault.
On the papal bull, it says that all of the souls in the world belong to the Roman Catholic Church and they do because no one has challenged their claim.
Your birth certificate is the title of the soul that they own in their registries. They have registered you and that is the title to your soul.
The Inquisition began because many people were waking up to the tyranny and oppression of the Roman Catholic Church in the early 1300’s.
The RCC killed these people due to their need to control humanity.
200 years later during the Renaissance, the Hermetica was written, which is where the bible draws all of its inspiration from.
This knowledge was also suppressed by the RCC.
Elite families control the Vatican and the corporation (the incorporation of the Apostle Peter).
In 325 AD, the emperor, Constantine the Great, made a donation to his Pope, Sylvester saying, “Saint Peter is the Apostle of Jesus of whom Jesus gave this kingdom of Earth to, therefore we are going to claim taxes.”
We pay taxes to Rome, the Kazarian and Venetian black nobility elite families based on a fictional document from Constantine.
Because of a decree written by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, the RCC owns everything,
Even what you think you might own such as your car, house or even the pair of shoes you are wearing belongs to the RCC (in their twisted minds).
We can thank Pope Gregory for the current Gregorian calendar, which rearranged the previous Julian calendar to match the Pagan holidays that the Roman Catholic Church claims as Christian holidays.
The Gregorian calendar also conveniently has a correlation with the Mayan calendar:
They only control the Persona not the living breathing flesh and blood man or woman.
They have absconded with nearly all our rights. From the moment you are born to the moment you transit this frequency.
They only acknowledge the Mother as she signs Schedule 1 of the Birth Certificate.
In Upper and Lower Case. ie John Smith. He is registered in Birth Deaths and Marriages which is the State.
They declare the baby dead and appoint the parents guardians and Administrators until the child reaches maturity.
The parents have thirty or sixty days to declare the child lives otherwise the Courts take over as Administrator and you have to study Trustee Law.
They State takes out a loan against you which is what they want your taxes to pay off.
Being now among the living dead you have an ALL CAPITAL LETTER DRIVING LICENSE , PASSPORT, CREDIT CARD, BANKCARD.
You all have money being administered by the State which runs into millions and the only way they can access it is through Legal Aid hence all the Fines which are artificial they create to fleece you.
On a Tombstone you will see the name of your loved ones chiselled in ALL CAPS. They are dead and so are you deemed the same all your life.
As to the Church when you are Baptized or Confirmed or However and You receive a Baptism Certificate well yes the Church Invests your Soul as collateral as has been doing the same for years.
The same story is in the Wizard of Oz.
The Bailiff is going to Steal the farm.
You have the Tin Man who represents the Tax Identification Number (TIN)
You have the Strawman which represents the ALL CAPITAL LETTER ARTIFICIAL PERSON looking to live
You have the Cowardly Lion who has to become educated and fight the System to regain his rights.
click image for video
In 1302 the Pope
declared himself king of the world
along with everything in it of value
This included all people
who would be enslaved.
He started the Unam Sanctum trust
which is still in force to this day
This is how it’s done ‘Heeling’
THE VATICAN AND YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE
Taking the Heel Print
of a new-born
to attach it to the
‘still-born entity’ file
to deliver it to the
by postal services
generating a serial number’
The Vatican file of each living and departed
human for several thousand years back in time
exists in those archives
Trillions of them
All on factual paper
… along with all your previous incarnations
… are stored and processed with the Vatican walls
…modern hi-tech data centres are managing the
processing of all this data on us and our existence
here on earth
click image for video
Talks about her experience in the hospital just after the birth of her child, when the ‘Heeling’ process was about to be performed.
She talks about how it is an offence to not allow this, (where she was).
Just goes to show what importance this is given to this process to this day.
video: Wilke Ferguson Courthouse Florida
Wilke Ferguson Courthouse Florida
built as a ship (in dry-dock)
to demonstrate the
You probably don’t want to find yourself in this place.
They make no attempt to hide what kind of justice they impart – other than to block the view with ‘supporting’ buildings on both sides.
There’s more information about what a horror this place is in the attached video
What is it?
We hear a lot about our ‘Common Law rights’
but few people know what they are
or what Common Law really means.
Here’s a simple explanation.
‘ Look you do whatever you like, it’s your life
as long as what you do doesn’t affect me in a way I don’t like’.
Common Law in 6 words.
Now for another explanation
Common Law is the Law of the Land.
(not the sea)
Common Law has been the basis of all law since the dawn of time.
You don’t need a ‘judge’ to tell you when
you’ve broken a Common Law –
your conscience does that for you.
It is the law decided on by the people,
a community, or a nation that
they decide on as a whole.
Common Law is also known as God’s Law,
Natural Law, and the People’s Law.
Common Law is very simple.
It is a common law ordained by the creator
(whatever you perceive that to be)
and the people of a community.
It has only two basic principles:
Do no harm to others
Take responsibility for your actions
It’s basis is that you, as a sacred human being,
have the freedom to do pretty much whatever you like,
where you like, when you like.
As long as…
You do not harm another person physically or mentally or financially
You do not harm another person’s reputation by slander
You do not harm any other person’s environment.
The world is owned by all to be enjoyed by everyone
with as much claim to it’s sovereign state as anyone else.
No other person has any right to tell you how you can or can’t live your life.
You do not harm another person by stealing from them.
You do not harm another person by defrauding them.
Live and let live.
Not hard is it.
That’s why Admiralty Law
to completely enslave us
and make us compliant to more rules and regulations
than we know exist – so they can fine us for ‘breaking’ them.
All the other legal BS we put up with was created by man – to keep us enslaved in whatever ‘rules’ the legal system imposed – mostly to keep us ‘in-line’ and poor.
They make out that, by using whacky fancy dress and language to intimidate us, bowing and scraping to each other to give us the impression they’re ‘special’ humans in some way, symbology like blindfolded people holding scales to impress us that justice is fair to all.
But, we know, it isn’t.
We KNOW It favours the rich and powerful – as we see time and time again – but are now conditioned to accept ‘that’s just the way it is’.
And, it is, as long as we allow it.
Time for a change in attitude – or this we’ll never be rid of this control.
Common law supersedes the ‘Admiralty Law’ our controllers have imposed on us. They know it – they just don’t want us to know it because they know if we find out we will destroy them.
This is why they made us ‘DEAD’ and lost-at-sea as individuals when we was born and, instead, turned each and every one of us into a ‘corporation’ when we was born and gave us a BERTH (no error) certificate. We was ‘cargo’ that came out of our mother’s BERTH canal.
And we was turned into cargo with a value that could be traded.
Why, because …
Admiralty Law cannot have jurisdiction over a living person.
Only Common Law can.
but ,conversely …
Common Law cannot deal with a corporation only Admiralty Law can
and it can also impose ‘rules’ on those corporations, (us), for us to break
so it can punish us and issue penalties for breaking them.
Admiralty Law is there to screw us and keep us poor.
Common law is fair for all and requires no legal ‘system’ to maintain
Only the rich with their slick expensive lawyers can benefit from Admiralty Law.
Are you beginning to see what’s been going on?
What are some of the crimes
the political parties have
committed against us under
their Admiralty Law?
Among the many actions they have taken that have destroyed our once productive and wealthy nation are:
- They have implemented punitive fines against us without our permission.
- They have sold off our Publicly owned utilities and services to private corporations, (they usually have a financial interest in).
- Unlawfully taxed us without a referendum, as required by our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901.
- Raised taxation to such a level that our once thriving manufacturing industries were forced to relocate overseas, which has weakened our nation so that we are unable to produce goods for our own needs, and protect our nation from invasion.
- They have set aside our Constitution and deprived us of the lawful protection of the Crown and our Common Law.
- They have created a false Queen, THE QUEEN OF AUSTRALIA (which is NOT the Queen of England), and registered this entity in their corporate entity in the USA.
- They have forced us to vote into power over us political party representatives who are employees of a private corporation registered in the USA and known as THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT.
- They are forcing medical procedures on us, a clear violation of the 1946 Constitutional amendment (51 [xxiiiA] that We, the People of the Commonwealth of Australia voted on to allow the government to provide medical services, but with the proviso that they cannot force any procedure on us. They have attempted to socially distance us, force us to wear masks, and force us to be ‘vaccinated’ with an unknown and untested ‘vaccine’ (in reality an experimental DNA altering cocktail)
- They have destroyed our right to Freedom of Movement by locking us down, and trying to introduce a ‘Vaccine Passport’, forcing us to accept their ‘vaccination’ before we can fly anywhere.
These are just some of the many TREASONOUS ACTS the political parties have enacted against us.
The only reason they have got away with bringing in so many laws and destroying our rights and freedoms that actually harm We, the People, is because we were not informed and therefore we were blind to their criminal actions.
You can choose to ignore this or, maybe, it’s time to have a look at what’s been going on.
It’s a theory that courts applying maritime law were created by Satanists.
Apparently, when a judge, (or any other person in situation of apparent ‘authority’), bangs a gavel 3 times it’s a celebration of the nails that Jesus experienced when he was crucified. (One in each hand and one in the ankles).
Unalienable Rights are the Inherent, Sovereign, Natural Rights that existed before the creation of the State, and which, being antecedent to and above the State, can never be taken away, diminished, altered, or levied by the State, except by Due Process of Law.
Nor can any Unalienable Right be fundamentally removed or waived by contract, whether by non-disclosure, which is fraud and unenforceable in Law, or knowingly by sufferance, which is contrary to the Spirit of the Law and prejudicial to Sovereignty.
The Original, Permanent, Unalienable Rights
of every Man or Woman, include:
* The Right to Life, Freedom, Health and the Pursuit of Happiness
* The Right to Contract, or Not to Contract, which is Unlimited
* The Right to Earn a Living Income by being Compensated with Wages or a Salary in a Fair Exchange for one’s Work
* The Right to Travel in the Ordinary Course of one’s Life and Business
* The Right to Privacy and Confidentiality, free from Unwarranted Invasion
* The Right to Own, and Hold Property, Lawfully without Trespass
* The Right to Self-Defence when threatened with Harm, Loss or Deceit
* The Right to Due Process of Law, with Notice and Opportunity to Defend
* The Right to be Presumed Innocent, suffering No Detention or Arrest, No Search or Siezure, without Reasonable Cause
* The Right to Remain Silent when accused, to avoid Self-Incrimination
* The Right to Equality in the eyes of the Law, and to Equal Representation
* The Right to Trial by Jury, being an Impartial Panel of one’s Peers
* The Right to Appeal in Law against Conviction or Sentence, or both
* The Right to Expose Knowledge necessary to one’s Rights and Freedoms
* The Right to Peaceful Association, Assembly, Expression, and Protest
* The Right to Practice a Religion, and to have Beliefs, of one’s choosing
* The Right to Love, and to Consensual Marriage with Children, as a Family
* The Right to Security from Abuse, Persecution, Tyranny, and War
* The Right to Refuse to Kill under command, by reason of Conscience
* The Right to Live in Peace and be left alone when Law-Abiding
If you do not know your rights,
you effectively have none.
By the path of Ignorance, whether by Apathy or Deception,
The People arrive in a State of Exploitation, Oppression, and Tyranny.
U.S. SUPREME COURT
AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS
PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY
FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE
ON COMMON WAYS
“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.”
Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” –
Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 “… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.”
Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009 “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .”
Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963). “The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.”
Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966). “A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use.”
Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41. “The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.”
Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236. “The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971) “The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.”
House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. “The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles.
Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666. “The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.”
Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 “A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159;
Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 “There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 “The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.”
-American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: “(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways…” 10) The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. “A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.”
-International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120 The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.’”
-City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232 “Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled” – Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20 ”
The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of.”
Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907). “…a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon…” State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982;
Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 “The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.”
Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163 “the right of the Citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business… is the usual and ordinary right of the Citizen, a right common to all.” –
Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 “Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways… transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.”
Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22. “Traffic infractions are not a crime.” People v. Battle “Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3 “The word ‘operator’ shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.”
Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 “Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen.” Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 “RIGHT — A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961. “Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.”
City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910. “A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639. “The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.”
Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273. “The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation.”
Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 (1972). “If [state] officials construe a vague statute unconstitutionally, the citizen may take them at their word, and act on the assumption that the statute is void.” –
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). “With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police authority.” Donnolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 540; Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. Co., 24 A. 848; O’Neil vs. Providence Amusement Co., 108 A. 887. “The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution.”
(Paul v. Virginia). “[T]he right to travel freely from State to State … is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of association, it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all.” (U.S. Supreme Court,
Shapiro v. Thompson). EDGERTON, Chief Judge: “Iron curtains have no place in a free world. …’Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the Constitution.’
Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270, 274, 21 S.Ct. 128, 45 L.Ed. 186. “Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases.” Id., at 197.
Kent vs. Dulles see Vestal, Freedom of Movement, 41 Iowa L.Rev. 6, 13—14. “The validity of restrictions on the freedom of movement of particular individuals, both substantively and procedurally, is precisely the sort of matter that is the peculiar domain of the courts.” Comment, 61 Yale L.J. at page 187. “a person detained for an investigatory stop can be questioned but is “not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled, and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest.”Justice White, Hiibel “Automobiles have the right to use the highways of the State on an equal footing with other vehicles.”
Cumberland Telephone. & Telegraph Co. v Yeiser 141 Kentucy 15. “Each citizen has the absolute right to choose for himself the mode of conveyance he desires, whether it be by wagon or carriage, by horse, motor or electric car, or by bicycle, or astride of a horse, subject to the sole condition that he will observe all those requirements that are known as the law of the road.”
Swift v City of Topeka, 43 U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 4 Kansas 671, 674. The Supreme Court said in U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431: An administrative regulation, of course, is not a “statute.” A traveler on foot has the same right to use of the public highway as an automobile or any other vehicle.
Cecchi v. Lindsay, 75 Atl. 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) 185. Automotive vehicles are lawful means of conveyance and have equal rights upon the streets with horses and carriages.
Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 205; See also: Christy v. Elliot, 216 Ill. 31; Ward v. Meredith, 202 Ill. 66; Shinkle v. McCullough, 116 Ky. 960; Butler v. Cabe, 116 Ark. 26, 28-29. …automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. Daily v. Maxwell, 133 S.W. 351, 354.
Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. 2d 588, 591. A farmer has the same right to the use of the highways of the state, whether on foot or in a motor vehicle, as any other citizen.
Draffin v. Massey, 92 S.E.2d 38, 42. Persons may lawfully ride in automobiles, as they may lawfully ride on bicycles. Doherty v. Ayer, 83 N.E. 677, 197 Mass. 241, 246;
Molway v. City of Chicago, 88 N.E. 485, 486, 239 Ill. 486; Smiley v. East St. Louis Ry. Co., 100 N.E. 157, 158. “A soldier’s personal automobile is part of his ‘household goods[.]’
U.S. v Bomar, C.A.5(Tex.), 8 F.3d 226, 235” 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94. “[I]t is a jury question whether … an automobile … is a motor vehicle[.]”
United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1983). Other right to use an automobile cases: –
EDWARDS VS. CALIFORNIA, 314 U.S. 160 –
TWINING VS NEW JERSEY, 211 U.S. 78 – WILLIAMS VS. FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274 – CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. 35, AT 43-44 – THE PASSENGER CASES, 7 HOWARD 287, AT 492 – U.S. VS. GUEST, 383 U.S. 745, AT 757-758 (1966) –
GRIFFIN VS. BRECKENRIDGE, 403 U.S. 88, AT 105-106 (1971) – CALIFANO VS. TORRES, 435 U.S. 1, AT 4, note 6 –
SHAPIRO VS. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) – CALIFANO VS. AZNAVORIAN, 439 U.S. 170, AT 176 (1978) Look the above citations up in American Jurisprudence. Some citations may be paraphrased.
click image for video
NICELY PUT TOGETHER
OUR COMMON LAW RIGHTS
click image for video
Why you are DEAD!
In law, a DEAD man has no rights…
While you are dead, the administrator-trustee, has total control over your estate, (Birth-right ownership over the mineral and energy wealth of the country you were born on) because you are assumed dead…
If you were assumed legally dead at such a young age and you never returned back to your true correct birthright legal standing without making a will or an agreement of compensation in order to enter into their fraud, (Because you were too young to know and you were never told), your whole life as an assumed legally dead “person” will be under the total control of the person that perpetrated the fraud against you in the first place…
If the registrar general of your birth certificate is a banker of the foreign private Rothschild’s banking system, than that is your master within their legally dead world, you left your real Christ…
The world of Mamon and usury is the underworld of the legally dead and if your equity dies (Your real body) while you remain in their system of the legally dead, so does your true God given rights that was only given to the living, die along with it…
To let go of the underworld gutter of Mamon is to reclaim your “life” but too many people love the life of the underworld-mamon too much to ever let go of the legal titles of the world of the legally dead…
Once you let go of the legal title, the equity returns on the condition you know who you “really” are, as in your real name, your real date of birth and your real number in registry…
Being “BIRTHED” into the underworld is being birthed into legal death …
click image for video
WHY BIRTH CERTIFICATES
were REALLY CREATED?
click image for video
Meet your strawman
Your Strawman Is an Artificial Person.
At the time of birth, each person is issued their own strawman, legally speaking.
On a birth certificate, the name that appears is in all capital letters.
This name is a person’s legal name.
However, people often write their names using a combination of lowercase and capital letters, which is, legally speaking, a separate entity.
video: Click image for video
Commerce – Law of the Sea
The esoteric law of the sea – commerce.
Sergeant Robert Horton
Masonic War Platform
Sergeant Robert Leroy Horton (US Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command) trained US Army Special Forces Green Berets explains how Russell Jay Gould and David Winn Miller saved our Republic in 1999 which will have a knock on effect for all nations subjugated to the crown.
In 1973 Gough Whitlam sacked the Queen
Since then, true royal commission’s don’t exist anymore.
Gough Whitlam also removed 1901 constitutional right to referendum and royal commission.
We’re on a legalese Roman law system now, Corpus Juris Admiralty.
The bar survives on Gough’s treason, so does the corporate 1986 Australia Act.
So anyone thinking that royal commission will get real recognition, needs do do some research.
This website is always
'work in progress'
please report broken links
Send files or messages direct to
Browse in safety
this website does not collect
any information or leave cookies