click this image for video

click the image below for ALL
website-page navigation buttons
or scroll down to 
for page content

Go to Rabbit Hole Grand Central for links to all pages

Links to

more pages

you might



click image for video

Australian Whistleblower:
Australia, Canada & New Zealand
Are Fake Nations Illegally Highjacked

October 15, 2010
Wayne Levick &
NZ Radio Host, Vinny Eastwood

This Shocking Secret Poses the Biggest Threat to the British Crown Colonies, the UK and USA. Conclusive Proof they have Highjacked the Legitimate Constitutional Governments and Replaced them with Fraudulent Corporations Under the Control of a Secret Globalist Led Cabal.

Claims have been made that Rogue Nations like China and Israel Have All of the Documentation that Conclusively Proves they are All Illegitimate Nations.



This is the ‘official’ spin
on the
‘NEW’ Canadian constitution

What you need to know about
Canada’s Constitution

What is a constitution?

A constitution is the supreme law of the land.

It takes precedence over all other laws in the country.

A constitution describes how a country governs itself.

It contains rules or principles which tell the government what it can or cannot do.

If the government makes a law that contradicts the constitution, a court can tell the government that the law is ‘unconstitutional’ and therefore that it has no effect.

A constitution can also guarantee rights and freedoms for citizens.

For example, in Canada, certain rights and freedoms are protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which is part of the Constitution.

In this way, a constitution reflects a nation’s values. It has been described as “a mirror reflecting the national soul”.

Constitutions come in different shapes and sizes.

Some are entirely written (like the Constitution of the United States of America), and some are not (like the Constitution of the United Kingdom).

Some are partly written and partly unwritten (like Canada’s Constitution).

Some constitutions change often, and some stay very stable.

There are good reasons why it should be difficult for a country to change its constitution.

Because Canada’s Constitution is the country’s supreme law, changing it is a very serious matter.

If a government could easily change the constitution, there is the danger that changes could be made that would benefit the government’s short-term interest at the expense of the principles on which it was founded.

For example, changing the constitution to limit citizen’s freedom of expression may help a government silence criticism, but this is a freedom that most Canadians feel is in the country’s best long-term interest.

What is Canada’s Constitution?

This question does not have a clear answer.

Canada’s Constitution is partly written, and partly unwritten.

Written parts

An important written part of Canada’s Constitution is the Constitution Act, 1867.

The Constitution Act, 1867, which was passed by the British Parliament, created the Dominion of Canada.

It describes the basic structure of Canada’s government.

Among other things, the Constitution Act, 1867 creates provincial legislatures, the Senate, and the courts.

It also describes how the federal and provincial governments divide their powers.

For example, only the federal government has the power to make laws about crimes, and only the provincial governments can make laws about education.

The Constitution Act, 1982 was a major addition to the Constitution.

Until 1982, the British Parliament had the power to control Canada’s Constitution.

However, the federal and provincial governments patriated the Constitution in 1982.

This means that the British Parliament gave Canada full control over its Constitution.

Even though Canada patriated its Constitution in 1982, the Constitution Act, 1867 remains in full force.

The Constitution Act, 1982 has several parts.

It includes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

It protects the rights of Aboriginal peoples.

It affirms that the Constitution is the supreme law of Canada, and that courts can “strike down” laws which are unconstitutional.

It also describes the rules for changing the Constitution.

These rules make it hard to change the Constitution because most provinces need to agree on important changes, and provinces often disagree on big issues.

The 1867 and 1982 Acts are probably the most well-known written parts of the Constitution.

However, there are other British and Canadian laws which are also part of the Constitution.

For example, the laws adding more provinces to Canada are constitutional documents.

Older documents, like ancient treaties, royal proclamations, and even some British laws from the 18th century are considered part of the Constitution.

Unwritten parts

Canada’s Constitution is partly unwritten.

How is that possible?

This is possible because the Constitution is “similar in principle to that of the United Kingdom” which is completely unwritten.

The Constitution Act, 1867 states that the Constitution is based on the Constitution of the United Kingdom, which contains unwritten principles and conventions.

Courts are responsible for interpreting the unwritten elements.

The Supreme Court of Canada has said that unwritten principles are “assumptions upon which the text is based” and understood to be a part of the Constitution even though they are not written in the text.

In that sense, the unwritten principles were always there, and the courts are merely describing them.

Some of these unwritten parts are called unwritten principles.

These principles do not stand alone as rules. Instead, they “breathe life” into the Constitution and fill in some of the “gaps” in the text.

For example, democracy is an important unwritten principle of the Constitution.

Courts use this principle as a tool in interpreting the Constitution. Democracy, in part, means that legislatures are elected by popular vote and that citizens have the right to vote.

The principle of democracy includes respect for human dignity, justice and equality, diversity of beliefs, and the participation of individuals in society.

When courts make decisions based on the Constitution, they can use democratic principles to guide their decisions.

Constitutional conventions are also unwritten.

These are political rules, not legal rules.

They are not found anywhere in the Constitution.

They come from the practices of government officials.

Politicians and government officials who do not follow them are not acting illegally, nor can courts enforce them.

However, they are part of Canada’s political fabric, and a part of the Constitution.

For example, the Constitution states that Royal Assent is required before any bill becomes law.

However, it is a constitutional convention that the Governor General cannot use his or her discretion to refuse to give Royal Assent to a bill after it has been passed by the House of Commons and the Senate.

Canada’s Evolving Constitution

Even though parts of the Constitution are centuries old, it has been referred to as a “living tree” because its meaning can evolve over time as society changes.

The Supreme Court of Canada has said that “the Constitution must be viewed as a ‘living tree capable of growth and expansion within its natural limits.’”

This metaphor is the way that courts in Canada should interpret the Constitution, “ensuring that Confederation can be adapted to new social realities”.

The Constitution may have meant one thing in 1867, but it could mean something different today.

For example, the Constitution since 1867 has said that the federal government can make laws about marriage.

In 1867, the meaning of marriage was limited to being between a man and a woman.

If the government had tried to change the definition of marriage, it probably would have been unconstitutional.

However, in 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada said that the government was allowed to make laws about same-sex marriage.

The Constitution by that point
had evolved to reflect society’s values.

In contrast with how Canadian courts should interpret the Constitution, some judges in the United States prefer to interpret the American Constitution by what they thought it meant when it was first written, or by how other people living at the time would have interpreted it.

Where did Canada’s Constitution come from?

Canada’s Constitution was created by the United Kingdom because Canada was originally a colony of the UK.

The Constitution Act, 1867 created the federal system of government.

Canada could not change or add to this.

The Constitution at that point also included older documents like the Treaty of Paris (1763) and the Quebec Act (1774).

After 1867, the Constitution began to evolve as the courts interpreted it. Until 1975, it was occasionally amended as Parliament grew and more provinces were added.

By the early 1980s, politicians decided it was time to patriate the Constitution.

They wanted to have full control over it without having to ask the British Parliament for changes.

What they needed was a formula or a process that would allow them to make changes to the Constitution that the federal and provincial governments could all agree to.

Coming up with an amending formula that they could all agree with took many years.

Finally, in November, 1981 the federal and provincial governments agreed to a formula.

As a result, the British Parliament passed the Canada Act 1982, giving Canada the power to control its Constitution.

This Act included the Constitution Act, 1982, which contains the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Canada’s Constitution was now truly its own.

After 1982, the federal and provincial governments could use the amending formula to make their own changes.

August 27th 2022 …


Message to Canadians

Seems news from Canada
has sort of dried up
since the truckers rally
earlier this year.

If you’re a Canadian and have some
information to share about anything
send a message.

click image for video

February 9th. 2023

What’s up Canada?

They knew it
they did it anyway

This changes everything…

While this video is referenced to Canada, it’s subject is universal.

Canadian First Nation
crisis flag

being flown in Ottawa now
February 2022

Quebec people …

just so you know who your officials
are really working for 

Dunno who the ‘official’ is   …
but his boss isn’t you

This young guy is more clued up
than most ‘adults’


What’s going on in Ottawa?

Are the Canadian police

The image and the video below came from different sources.

Neither can be verified.

Make of them whatever you will.

What’s going on in Ottawa?

Is the Canadian truckers
freedom rally

Truckers rally logo.

A bit close to home with the
unnecessary 666 on the logo
much like the Chrome logo

The ‘spokes’ on this  logo are completely unnecessary

Both Australia and Canada
have been raped, pillaged and plundered
ever since they was originally settled and
the indigenous populations was removed

Australian traitors who sold us out
have their own page

Here’s a start about Canada’s traitors

This page was started 7 February 2022
and is ongoing ‘work in progress’.
Contributions welcomed.

Video - click image

We’ll keep this
for historical purposes

‘Many Canadians think
this guy above is the
cause of all their troubles’

He’s not – he’s just the hired help
following instructions.

He’s disposable – and he knows it

It’s the hidden people he works for call the shots
and they’re worse monsters than he is.

Even if he ‘went’ the troubles would continue
he’d just be replaced by another parasite.

Seems all countries have got one
and there’s probably a whole population
of ‘wannabees’ waiting in line to be them
if they need replacing.

Check below.

Sorry Canadians,
especially those who are
‘loyal to the the flag’
you’ve been shafted!

The image on the ‘NEW’ Canadian flag
isn’t a Maple Leaf
it’s some kind of masonic emblem
based on a pentagram.

Here’s MORE Masonic symbols

perhaps you can find it

Video below,
how to create a
for a Canadian Flag

Something quietly happened
to our ‘commonwealth’ countries
and their relationship with
England and the ‘Queen’
around the same time
(from about 1900 onwards).

Australia and New Zealand
are in the same boat.

They’re no longer countries.

They’ve all been literally sold
by their corrupt governments
and became ‘corporations’.


From the Wakaminenga Maori Government
Aotearoa Nu Tireni New Zealand

Official Statement

Web Page

Declaration of protection for protesters at Parliament

United Tribes (NZ)
Unofficial Flag

The ‘populations’
weren’t consulted

or advised.

No referendums were held to confirm consent,
as required by their constitutions so,
since then, all ‘governments’
that have given the impression they
swore an oath to the crown
have lied and are guilty of treason.

If their members chose to
swear an oath to Freemasonry,
(which ALL Freemasons must swear),
the Freemason oath supersedes
any other oath they made.

This means the have CHOSEN to
betray their country and they are traitors.

read the Masonic oath HERE

Canada, (and Australia, and probably New Zealand),  has no relationship with any English ‘commonwealth’, has no constitution that protects the rights of Canadians does not have the ‘protection’ of the Queen of England and is ruled by Admiralty Law, not Common Law.

And, the ‘NEW’ Canadian flag isn’t a Maple Leaf.

Never was.

The ‘red’ Canadian flag, (why red?), is based on a pentagram. (It’s only a guess but it looks like a ‘crown’. Further research may reveal more information).

The video above, (and many other YouTube videos that do the same thing), describe how to draw a ‘Maple Leaf’.

(Start with a pentagram, then …)

It’s been a con all along, as usual in clear sight.

The ‘new’ Canadian flag was introduced in the mid-1960’s, (which nobody got a say in – it just turned up despite the protestations of many), to replace the original flag which was connected to the UK.

Why did Canada decide it needed a new flag and one without any reference to England?

Maybe this was because, at that time, Canada was removed from the commonwealth and the Queen of England was sacked.

Canadians, (and Australians), were not consulted about this and this move was not put to a vote in a referendum to make it legal.

Ask any Canadian, even today, and they, like Australians, will consider their countries are still part of the commonwealth and ‘ruled’ by the Queen of England.

They’re not – even though they maintain fake positions of a ‘Governor General’ who represents the Queen of England to continue the illusion they are.

Both Canadians and Australians was having their constitutions pulled out from under them without their knowledge in order that the central bankers could take over.

The page ‘Australian Traitors’ on this website explains what happened in Australia in more detail.

Just about ALL Canadians don’t know this – and searching online for information is just about useless.

A copy of the, (amended), Canadian Constitution is downloadable HERE.

As with all constitution these days the written word seems to have little resemblance to the reality of what actually happens.

Bit by bit, citizens rights have been stripped away and are now, in reality, a thing of the past and government, protected by it’s bands of hired thugs, (who are likely recruited into Freemasonry themselves),  make up their own rules to suit their agenda.

Just ask any inhabitant of Aboriginal descent.

In many respects, this is the way it’s always been – it’s just that now, the cats out of the bag.

Click button image above for
Canadian Constitution (revised)


The order was issued in 2013 by six judges of the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels. Grieving parents haven’t seen their children since they left for a picnic with the Royal couple on Oct. 10 1964.

After nearly a year of litigation Queen Elizabeth and her husband Prince Phillip were found guilty in the disappearance of ten native children from the Catholic-run Kamloops residential school in British Columbia.

In 2017, the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State was asking concerned citizens to demand Cunningham’s immediate release. The ITCCS successfully prosecuted Queen Elizabeth’s kidnapping, along with 50,000 cases of other missing children.

remains of 215 children found

The abuse, trafficking, torture and murder of children appears endemic and continues to be actively practiced, and condoned, protected, by church, state, judicial and police globally.

click image for video


Today, on the 58th anniversary of the permanent disappearance of ten children from the Kamloops Indian residential school, new evidence has surfaced linking British monarch King Charles to their fate and to the death of other native children.

A group of witnesses have presented their affidavits to the special Tribunal that has convened to investigate Charles’ complicity in both the abduction of the ten children by Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip on October 10, 1964, and the medical murder of eyewitness William Combes in February 2011. (Breaking News, September 19/20, 2022: King Charles ordered to appear before International Tribunal over the death of William Combs and Others. – Murder by Decree)

According to the Tribunal’s Public Information Office,

“Our Tribunal has today received sworn statements from British and Canadian nationals. They claim to have witnessed the personal participation of Charles Mountbatten-Windsor, aka King Charles III, in ceremonies involving native children that occurred in Carnarvon Castle in Wales and at the former Catholic Indian school in Fort Providence, Canada, on October 30, 1964, and July 11, 1970, respectively.

“The first ceremony involved the ritual killing of Cecilia Arnold, age ten, and Edward Arnuse, age ten, two survivors of the original ten children abducted by Charles’ parents from the Kamloops Indian school. The second ceremony involved a similar ritual killing of an undetermined number of Inuit children provided by the clergy of the Catholic Sacred Heart Indian residential school in the Northwest Territories.

“Another witness, a former government employee, claims that then-Prince Charles had personal knowledge of and sanctioned a ‘kill order’ issued by the British MI-6 against William Combes, the sole living eyewitness to the October 1964 Kamloops abductions. Combes subsequently died of arsenic poisoning administered to him in St. Paul’s Catholic hospital in Vancouver on February 26, 2011.”

Click button below to see
nurse Chloe Kirker’s
video statement on YouTube

This new evidence and accompanying documentation has been entered into the docket of the Tribunal and will be presented at its opening session on Tuesday, November 1, 2022. Charles Mountbatten-Windsor has been issued a Public Summons to appear before the Tribunal.

Ten days before he was murdered by royal decree, William Combes met me at the Ovaltine café on Hastings Street in Vancouver. He was happier than normal because our movement had just held another church occupation and, in the glow of that victory, William had given up drinking the alcohol he needed to dull the memories of his torture by electric cattle prods when he was a child. With a shy smile, he handed me some poems he had just written.

After I read William’s poems, he asked me to hold on to them for him. We shook hands but we didn’t say goodbye, because we expected to rendezvous that same month in London, England, where William was scheduled to speak to our common law court about what he saw Queen Elizabeth do in Kamloops on October 10, 1964. But the crown struck first. Ten days later, William Arnold Combes was dead from arsenic poisoning.

The ones who killed my friend think that enough assassinations and midnight burials and official lies can rewrite history and swab memories. But fortunately, the truth can’t be controlled by us, because it comes from elsewhere, and has a life and force of its own that eventually wears down time and crime. And so now, even the enormous lie the crown and church have built around their Christian death camps is crumbling.

Today, it collapsed some more. William Combes has come alive and is pointing his accusing finger at the killers through living eyewitnesses who are telling our Tribunal who killed William and ten Kamloops children and many tens of thousands of other innocents. And that finger points directly at Charles Mountbatten-Windsor, the so-called King of England.

Here is what we know so far:

1. At sunset on Saturday, October 10, 1964, in the hills above Dead Man’s Creek 40 miles west of Kamloops, eight of the ten children who were abducted by Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten-Windsor from the Kamloops catholic residential school were ritually and brutally killed.

We know from a retired British security officer that both Elizabeth and Windsor were present at the ritual.

Two of the ten children were kept alive and brought to England, to the Roman-built Carnarvon Castle in north Wales.

The two children were Cecilia Arnold, an interior Salish girl from Kamloops, and Edward Arnuse, a Metis boy from Quesnel.

Both children were ten years old.

Barely two weeks later, at midnight on Samhain, October 30, 1964, Cecilia and Edward were ritually raped, tortured, killed, and cannibalistically devoured in the sub-basement crypt of Carnarvon Castle by a coven of the Vatican-led Ninth Circle cult.

Present and participating that night in that blood feast were Philip Mountbatten-Windsor and his eldest son Charles, who was inducted into the cult that night: the man now called the King of England.

2. On July 1, 1969, Charles was invested as the Prince of Wales in the same location, at a ceremony in Carnarvon Castle.

Exactly one year after, on July 1, 1970, Charles Mountbatten-Windsor began his first official visit to Canada along with his parents and sister Anne.

The ultimate destination of this so-called “royal tour” was rural aboriginal communities in Manitoba and at Fort Providence in the Northwest Territories.

And there, at another catholic residential school called Sacred Heart, aboriginal children once again died at the hands of the Mountbatten-Windsors and their Vatican accomplices.

3. In the ocean of blood deceptively called Indian residential schools where child murder was the norm, these killings remained cloaked in secrecy and terror.

But years later, the sole surviving eyewitness to the Kamloops abduction spoke publicly of what he saw.

William Combes was then ordered to be killed by a royal decree enacted through the British foreign intelligence agency MI-6 and its counterparts in the RCMP in Canada: specifically, by the west coast “E” division of the Mounties under the authority of its black ops coordinator Inspector Peter Montague.

On February 19, 2011, William was forcibly abducted from his East Pender Street slum hotel by three Mounties and brought to the catholic St. Paul’s hospital in Vancouver.

William’s nurse Chloe Kirker states on record that he was in good health and had no symptoms of his official cause of death, tubercular meningitis.

But by February 23 he developed what are called Mees’ Lines on his fingernails, which indicate arsenic poisoning.

And yet nurse Kirker was ordered by St. Paul’s administrators to keep William off any intravenous and thereby dehydrated: in hindsight, to allow the poison to disseminate quickly and fatally.

After William died, nurse Kirker was threatened not to speak of it.

After she was subjected to repeated of harassment and death threats, she quit her job and moved out of the country.

4. The Vancouver Coroner, Claire Thompson, took nearly four months to issue a report on the death of William Combes.

On June 13, 2011, Ms. Thompson stated on record that William Combes died of “disseminated tuberculosis”, despite William’s absence of TB symptoms and the indication of arsenic poisoning.

Ms. Thompson refused to answer all inquiries about William’s death.

The Vancouver Coroner’s office threatened to sue anyone who publicly challenged her report.

5. William Combes died the same week that Kevin Annett was invited in writing by Mohawk elders to begin investigations into mass graves of children at the former Church of England school in Brantford, Ontario: the same “Mush Hole” school where British and Dutch royal family members abducted aboriginal children routinely for over a century.

A church insider with considerable evidence of these abductions and the ritual killings of children at the Mush Hole, Leona Moses, was officially silenced by Anglican Archbishop Fred Hiltz after Kevin Annett appeared in Brantford in the spring of 2011.

Hiltz acted under the direct instructions of the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, according to Leona Moses.

But Leona died and her incriminating evidence was destroyed in a house fire after Kevin came to Brantford and commenced investigations at the Mush Hole mass grave site.

Prior to that, while Kevin was in London, England researching the Mush Hole archives, he was summarily arrested and deported from England, on May 26, 2011: three months to the day that William Combes had been murdered.

All of this proves again the murderous and criminal nature of the British Crown and its Vatican accomplice in genocide.

For many years we have exposed and proved this crime in courts of law and through the suffering and blood of eyewitnesses like William Combes.

But the criminals are still in charge, and they have absolved themselves of the crime and erased their atrocities and now even are erasing the erasure.

And so, the genocide continues.

We have learned there is no possibility of justice in their system, which is why we have created our own inquiries and our own courts of law outside their jurisdiction.

Our present Tribunal that is putting King Charles on trial is a continuation of that struggle.

But we are also arming ourselves with the means to enforce the verdict of this latest trial, by building our own common law Republics that can fight and overcome these crimes against humanity.

For we are engaged in a war to the death against tyranny and mass murder; and the first step in resisting those evils is to collectively declare our independence from their genocidal system in London, Rome, Beijing, and elsewhere.

If we refuse to honor and learn from our fallen heroes like William Combes, we not only dishonor their sacrifice for us, but we ensure our own destruction.

Remember, pick up their fallen sword, and carry on, lest the darkness hold final sway over humanity.

click image for video

Charles Windsor
was summoned to appear today,

September 20,
before an international Tribunal

to answer charges of his complicity in
the death of
indigenous children
and eyewitnesses like William Combes.

The summons can be read in its entirety at under ITCCS Updates
for September 20, 2022.
Issued by the International Common Law Court of Justice.
(Note: The Date is according to Greenwich Mean Time)

Book Link: Unrepentant

Kevin Annett’s book


Click text for full article

Murder by decree

In Memory To the many tens of thousands of children who died while in the internment and death camps falsely called “Indian residential schools”;

To those men and women who have fought against impossible odds to recover the memory of those children and the truth of how they died, and bring to justice who and what is responsible;

And to those who suffer and die today at the hands of the same criminal system.

“Earth, cover not their blood” And in Acknowledgment Of the heroic efforts of three ground breaking citizen-based Inquiries into Genocide in Canada:

The Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada (1998), The Friends and Relatives of the Disappeared (2005) and The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (2010);

and of Rev. Kevin D. Annett, who has fathered and led these movements from the beginning at enormous personal risk and sacrifice.

What Canada
and all survivors
owe to him
is incalculable.

follow links as necessary

International Child Sex Trafficking,
Organ and Adrenochrome Harvesting Ring
Run by the Vatican

Voice of the Republic,
Kevin Annette

•    The word is said so easily, so casually, so lifelessly: Genocide. The word means nothing to most people. To the rest, it is little more than the self-serving rhetoric of politicians and popes. But when I hear the word, I hear the tortured screams of little children that never stop, day or night.

•    I see a Vancouver Island Priest electrocuting a five-year-old boy with a cattle prod until he dies, his body tossed onto a pile of other small corpses and then buried in a secret grave barely a mile from where I would work one day.

•    I smell the sickly scent of burning flesh as other dead children and even living, newborn babies are incinerated in the Christian death camp furnaces that burn day and night.

•    I watch as children are made blind in deadly experiments and others have their teeth yanked out without painkillers by upstanding Canadian doctors.

•    I see other children battered and raped and left to starve to death by men and women who sing Christian hymns the next Sunday in church.

•    I watch as Harry Wilson shows me the scar on his tongue through which United Church minister John Andrews shoved a needle when a young Harry spoke of the dead girl he found.

•    I witness a lone and stumbling survivor named William Combes, too crushed to speak publicly of his tortures but somehow willing himself to, against every odd, even as the world hates him for it and finally kills him without consequence: just another dead Indian.

•    I hear Jackson Steene describe how his testicles shriveled and died as he was sterilized under an X ray machine at the Anglican hospital in Alert Bay, along with all five of his brothers.

•    I listen as Ricky Lavallee sobs and describes being forced to bury the body of his brother Ernie by the same Catholic Priest who had just flogged him to death.

•    I witness the people of my country and its churches commit or excuse or pay for these abominations decade after decade, and still today, without a flicker of conscience or remorse; and then, when they are exposed, they destroy the evidence and the secret graves of their victims while absolving themselves, rewriting and normalizing their wrong, and getting away with their mass murder of over 60,000 children by issuing some pay cheques and a glib apology.

•    And I wonder how people can do such things so easily and still consider themselves human beings. I also remember how some of us fought so long and so hard to confront this murder and coverup until the truth was finally exposed at an enormous cost, including the death of seven of my friends. But then I watch as what we exposed is buried again and a false, sanitized history of the Canadian Holocaust is reissued by the killers and adopted as if none of these atrocities had ever happened.

•    And finally, I witness the world and everyone I know turn their indifferent backs on this carnage as if it doesn’t matter; as if it has nothing to do with the plague that is now sweeping the world and all of them.

•    I know these things so deeply because my own life has been shattered by them. It is not another issue. It is all completely personal to me, for it has been my life for almost thirty years. And still do the spirits of the fallen walk with me and struggle to cry out through my inadequate and solitary voice, knowing that our screams are inaudible to the legions of the walking dead, and that whatever is spoken and attempted now will not stop the abomination from continuing. There now stands only that judgment that is on all of us.

•    So, in these last days, remember as an epitaph that whatever justice has come from the seeds we sowed is only because they were watered with our blood and suffering. Perhaps some of you will earn and redeem this sacred inheritance by your own sacrifice: the cost of your departure from this bloody Land of No-One.

    Genocide in Canada and Around the Globe:



Queen Elizabeth II
monster bloodline

Video - click image

Where are the Kamloops children?

Click image for link to article


The Canadian Cabal
Pedophilia, Murder and Treason

Dating back to 3000BC the Cabal
has been involved in strange sexual practices.

There is evidence that Pierre Trudeau
was a communist and a pedophile.


This website is always
'work in progress' and your
contributions, corrections and
suggestions are invited
Please report broken links
Send files or messages direct to
None of the content of this website is original.
All content is collected from that
readily available on the public domain
and does not reflect the views or
opinions of the website creator and should
be viewed critically and considered satire.


Contact Red Pilled Truthers